Re: NATD+SSL

2001-10-10 Thread Ulf Zimmermann
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:00:07PM +, Alex Newman wrote: > Ok I know this sounds wacky, but I will try justify why i think it is > usefull. If someone can think of a better way to achieve goals 1-3 or if > they are silly goals please tell me. How easy would it be to implement ssl > in the r

Re: NATD+SSL

2001-10-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Alex Newman wrote: > 2) It would allow you to more efficently have ssl proxy boxes infront of an > array of webservers. This is useful if you had for instance a hardware > crypto card in the ssl proxy. Currently the only decent way I know to do > this today is with linux+stunnel since it has trans