Charles Sprickman writes:
> I don't know how much of it to believe, since it is marketing material,=20
> but the Seagate white paper on their site claims that all the=20
> command-queueing stuff brings the performance very close to that of scsi.
>
In my experience ATA drives really lack when it c
David Gilbert wrote:
"Søren" == Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Søren> David Gilbert wrote:
"João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right?
Well
João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote:
What is the practical diference? Performance?
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
Any other drives (as far as I
> "Søren" == Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Søren> David Gilbert wrote:
>>> "João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>> João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
>> João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really imp
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performa
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
added one to my comput
David Gilbert wrote:
"João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right?
Well... from what I've read, the WD bridged drives do have queueing
becaus
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
> > Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
>
> > Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
>
> I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
> added one to my compu
David Gilbert wrote:
"João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right?
Well... from what I've read, the WD bridged drives do have queueing
because they had a
> "João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right?
Well... from what I've read, the WD bridged drives do have queueing
because they had an ATA-100 impl
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote:
What is the practical diference? Performance?
I don't know how much of it to believe, since it is marketing material,
but the Seagate white paper on their site claims that all the
command-queueing stuff b
> "Charles" == Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] João Carlos Mendes Luís
Charles> wrote:
>> What is the practical diference? Performance?
Charles> I don't know how much of it to believe, since it is marketing
Charles> material, but the S
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote:
What is the practical diference? Performance?
I don't know how much of it to believe, since it is marketing material,
but the Seagate white paper on their site claims that all the
command-queueing stuff brings the performance very
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
added one to my computer, which came with a Maxtor 6Y080L0. My main
disk intensive operation i
> "João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> What is the practical diference? Performance? FUJISHIMA
Well... one practical difference is: what are you paying for? Same
old crap with a new connector?
One really practical difference is that the SiI 3114 and 3112 chi
What is the practical diference? Performance?
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive
Steven Hartland wrote:
Ah just added TCQ but still bridged I stand corrected :)
Right, I guess they just pulled it out from the attic, they had it on
some PATA devices back when, but there it newer caught on either :)
--
-Søren
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mai
Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe the second gen Raptors ( 74Gb ) are also native SATA
nope.
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
Any other drives (as far as I know, of co
Ah just added TCQ but still bridged I stand corrected :)
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "FUJISHIMA Satsuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://techreport.com/reviews/2004q1/raptor-wd740gd/index.x?pg=1
|Serial ATA interface Marvell 88i8030C bridge
=
At Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:39:57 -,
Steven Hartland wrote:
> I believe the second gen Raptors ( 74Gb ) are also native SATA
No.
http://techreport.com/reviews/2004q1/raptor-wd740gd/index.x?pg=1
|Serial ATA interface Marvell 88i8030C bridge
___
[EMAIL P
I believe the second gen Raptors ( 74Gb ) are also native SATA
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "FUJISHIMA Satsuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive with
serial-parallel bridge.
At Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500,
David
David Gilbert wrote:
Is there anyone compiling a list of "fake" vs. "real" SATA drives?
The difference being "fake" drives with ATA-100 electronics and an
SATA to ATA conversion chip vs. drives that really support SATA
natively?
Dave.
You can find a lot of info in the forums at storagereview.com
24 matches
Mail list logo
