Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2006-12-13 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Monday 11 December 2006 10:34, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I saw your (2004) post about the watchdog driver for the i8xx and I was > wondering if you could send it to me? Whoops, no wonder I didn't get a reply. Not to menion it's already committed :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engi

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Correction... On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 11:26:59PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > I wrote code to unlock the SMM within FreeBSD last summer on an IBM T22 ^^ discover and map. > with the 440BX chipset. Here it is. Half asleep here. Doh! BMS ___

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:40:33PM -0500, Don Bowman wrote: > SMI under freebsd? Ha ha... Good luck! It didn't look very > easy. The SMM, for those who don't know it, is a virtual > 86, real-mode thing, at a location in ram which is locked > and unaccessible unless you are in smm mode :) If you > a

RE: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Don Bowman
From: Doug Ambrisko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Don Bowman writes: > | The Intel ICH3 (and probably all) has the feature it can > | issue an SMI on first count-down to 0, then a hard reset > | on 2nd. What we did was implement an SMM handler (in bios) > | that, when called due to watchdog, issued a

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Don Bowman writes: | The Intel ICH3 (and probably all) has the feature it can | issue an SMI on first count-down to 0, then a hard reset | on 2nd. What we did was implement an SMM handler (in bios) | that, when called due to watchdog, issued an NMI and did | a return from smm. | In FreeBSD, an NMI

RE: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Don Bowman
From: Doug Ambrisko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Scott Long writes: > | In reading the code, it appears that it is indeed an ICHx > service and > | not limited to just i8xx chipsets. I have a few issues with how the > | probe and attach are done, and I'm addressing these in a > private mail > | r

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Scott Long writes: | In reading the code, it appears that it is indeed an ICHx service and | not limited to just i8xx chipsets. I have a few issues with how the | probe and attach are done, and I'm addressing these in a private mail | right now. It's funny that I was reading the Intel ICH5 docs l

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Scott Long
Doug Ambrisko wrote: Scott Long writes: | Wm. Daryl Hawkins wrote: | > I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for both | > FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE. | | This is wonderful. I'd be happy to test it and shepherd it in. Does it | support the intel 750x chips also? A

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Scott Long writes: | Wm. Daryl Hawkins wrote: | > I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for both | > FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE. | | This is wonderful. I'd be happy to test it and shepherd it in. Does it | support the intel 750x chips also? All ICH chips that I'v

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Scott Long
Wm. Daryl Hawkins wrote: I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for both FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE. This is my first driver and it's only seen limited testing, so proceed with caution! The FreeBSD-CURRENT package contains a loadable kernel module and was written to w

RE: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Wm. Daryl Hawkins
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:35 AM To: Wm. Daryl Hawkins Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Wm. Da ryl Hawkins" writes: > >I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for &

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Wm. Da ryl Hawkins" writes: > >I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for >both FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE. Is this written against the API in -current ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-12 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:07:36PM -0600, Wm. Daryl Hawkins wrote: > I would love to incorporate it in both source trees if possible. Before > it goes into current, I need to make some changes so that it will work > with Poul-Henning Kamp's new watchdog driver model. Hopefully, I'll get > to work

RE: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-11 Thread Mike Tancsa
Wm. Daryl Hawkins Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver Wow, this is great! I tried it out on a few RELENG_4 boxes and it works as expected wdog0 on motherboard isab0: Found Intel 82801DB watchdog device Are there any plans to incorporate this into the 5.x and 4.x source tr

RE: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-11 Thread Wm. Daryl Hawkins
rent as soon as it's ready. -- Daryl -Original Message- From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 9:17 PM To: Wm. Daryl Hawkins Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver Wow, this is great! I tried it out on a few RELENG_4 b

Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver

2004-03-10 Thread Mike Tancsa
Wow, this is great! I tried it out on a few RELENG_4 boxes and it works as expected wdog0 on motherboard isab0: Found Intel 82801DB watchdog device Are there any plans to incorporate this into the 5.x and 4.x source tree ? This would be useful to a lot of people. ---Mike On Wed, 10