On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Say... you wouldn't like to impliment an NT-style password hash, would you?
This is actually very easy, it turns out - the NT hash is just an MD4 over the
unicode version of the password, which is (for the default english locale or
whatever you call it), ju
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Say... you wouldn't like to impliment an NT-style password hash, would you?
This is actually very easy, it turns out - the NT hash is just an MD4 over the
unicode version of the password, which is (for the default english locale or
whatever you call it), j
[I've redirected this to -hackers where I probably should have sent it
initially.]
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > It would probably also be worthwhile redefining New-DES and our blowfish
> > format to fit this common form:
> >
> > $DES$$salt$hash
>
> IMHO, don't change the existing n
[I've redirected this to -hackers where I probably should have sent it
initially.]
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > It would probably also be worthwhile redefining New-DES and our blowfish
> > format to fit this common form:
> >
> > $DES$$salt$hash
>
> IMHO, don't change the existing
4 matches
Mail list logo