In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jonathan Lemon was heard blurting out:
>
>> In article
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> you write:
>> >I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
>> >(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is t
In article
you
write:
>On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jonathan Lemon was heard blurting out:
>
>> In article
>
> you write:
>> >I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
>> >(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
>> >already an implementation?
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 03:35:42PM -0700, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
> Does this mean NATD/VPN will work for the clients
> that are using M$ VPN? If so, the sooner the better for me.
I second that but I'm in no particular hurry there.
Supporting CHAP could be a pain?
-d
--
dannyman
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 03:35:42PM -0700, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
> Does this mean NATD/VPN will work for the clients
> that are using M$ VPN? If so, the sooner the better for me.
I second that but I'm in no particular hurry there.
Supporting CHAP could be a pain?
-d
--
dannyman -
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jonathan Lemon was heard blurting out:
> In article
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> you write:
> >I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
> >(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
> >already an implementation?
>
> Yes, I
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jonathan Lemon was heard blurting out:
> In article
>
> you write:
> >I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
> >(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
> >already an implementation?
>
> Yes, I've grabbed the G
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> In article
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> you write:
> >I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
> >(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
> >already an implementation?
>
Beware, there is na
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> In article
>
> you write:
> >I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
> >(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
> >already an implementation?
>
Beware, there is nasty crash when no
> > >I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
> > >(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
> > >already an implementation?
> >
> > Yes, I've grabbed the GRE support from NetBSD, and have it working
> > here (as far as I can tell). I'l
> > >I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
> > >(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
> > >already an implementation?
> >
> > Yes, I've grabbed the GRE support from NetBSD, and have it working
> > here (as far as I can tell). I'll
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
>(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
>already an implementation?
Yes, I've grabbed the GRE support from NetBSD, and have it working
here (as far a
Jonathan:
You're the man :-) I think we're both going in similar directions here...
Thanks.
-marc
Marc Nicholas netSTOR Technologies, Inc. http://www.netstor.com
"Fast, Expandable and Affordable Internet Caching Products"
1.877.
Jonathan:
You're the man :-) I think we're both going in similar directions here...
Thanks.
-marc
Marc Nicholas netSTOR Technologies, Inc. http://www.netstor.com
"Fast, Expandable and Affordable Internet Caching Products"
1.877.4
In article
you write:
>I don't seem to see support for GRE (IP-in-IP encaspulation) in FreeBSD
>(although I might be blind)...anyone working on support it or is there
>already an implementation?
Yes, I've grabbed the GRE support from NetBSD, and have it working
here (as far as I can tell). I'l
14 matches
Mail list logo
