On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:37:00 +0200, Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:17:31AM -0800, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> It didn't make it through this time, either. Note that the FreeBSD
> mailing list manager rejects attachments of certain types, so if you are
> sending
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:17:31AM -0800, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> OOpps .. forgot to actually attach my kvmtest.
It didn't make it through this time, either. Note that the FreeBSD
mailing list manager rejects attachments of certain types, so if you are
sending a C source file as, say, application
OOpps .. forgot to actually attach my kvmtest.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:05:31 -0800, Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well .. i noticed that kvm_getargv indeed only seems to use /proc in
> case that apparently the commandline argument list grows beyond a
> certain size, as i have been able to establish by trial and error.
OK .. i creat
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:21:54PM -0800, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
>
> I guess to sum it all up it all boils down to the following question.
>
> Is it intended that kvm_getargv() apparently has a conditional under
> which it depends on the existince of a working /proc .. even though
> the manpage st
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:19:52 +, Christian S.J. Peron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> iirc, kvm_getargv() can (and does first) use a sysctl to retrieve
> it's data. kvm_getenvv() requires procfs because
> /proc//mem is currently the more simpler to read a virtual
> memory address in the context o
6 matches
Mail list logo
