> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
> > > Qlogic ISP users now have completely useless boards.
> >
> > No, that's not correct either. Here's an editted copy of what I
>
> Jason tells me you have my card which exhibited exactly this symptom with
> a pc164 two years ago, though it worked in an x86 box.
>
Isn't that the the one now without a BIOS? That's the old 1020 PCI card,
which Qlogic made maybe < 500? It's the only one I have. Did you want
it back?
-matt
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 05:48:36PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
> > Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > ...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
> > > > Qlogic ISP
> Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > >What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
> > >too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
> > >since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
> > >I have is way too old, for exa
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> >What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
> >too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
> >since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
> >I have is way too old, for example).
> >
>
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
> > > Qlogic ISP users now have completely useless boards.
> >
> > No, that's not correct e
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
> > Qlogic ISP users now have completely useless boards.
>
> No, that's not correct either. Here's an editted copy of what I sent to
Well,
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:57:24 -0800
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Because what I did was wrong. It should also be removed from OpenBSD.
> > I've had extensive discussions with Theo about this, and the f/w will
> > probably be remove
As Matthew Jacob wrote ...
I'm not laughing, I think it is a bit sad.
I *do* have the Emulex docs available thru my employer. But I can't really
use them...
Wilko
> Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
> had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeB
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:57:24 -0800
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because what I did was wrong. It should also be removed from OpenBSD.
> I've had extensive discussions with Theo about this, and the f/w will
> probably be removed from OpenBSD as soon as the tree unlocks post 2.6.
>What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
>too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
>since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
>I have is way too old, for example).
>
>Any reason NetBSD and FreeBSD don't
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 12:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
> had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeBSD CVS repositories because
> the copyright was not so good. And in order to get
Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeBSD CVS repositories because
the copyright was not so good. And in order to get the technical manuals that
describe the f/w interface you have to sign an NDA.
On Thu, 4
As Matthew Jacob wrote ...
What does not help is that Emulex consider's their hardware / software
interface a trade secret. Meaning NDAs etc.
At least this is the last thing I heared.
Wilko
> We support the Qlogic 2100/2200 cards currently for both private loop and
> fabrics. The emulex card i
Hi- Yes- it was a fun though short lunch.
We support the Qlogic 2100/2200 cards currently for both private loop and
fabrics. The emulex card is popular, but nobody's written a driver for it for
FreeBSD.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> Thank you for lunch a
15 matches
Mail list logo
