This sounds and looks cool, diff looks OK (haven't applied), Luigi's
comments seem well thought out and expressed.
cheers
BMS
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send an
On Thursday 11 December 2008 14:42:46 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:52:49 +0200, Jonathan McKeown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> cdboot runs long after the prompt for BIOS setup. I don't think we
> >> can modify cdboot to add serial console support to systems whose BIOS
> >>
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:52:49 +0200, Jonathan McKeown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> cdboot runs long after the prompt for BIOS setup. I don't think we
>> can modify cdboot to add serial console support to systems whose BIOS
>> setup doesn't support it.
>
> Sorry, of course you're right: I'm talking
On Thursday 11 December 2008 10:45:41 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:37:26 +0200, Jonathan McKeown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While you're enhancing cdboot anyway, can I ask how complicated it
> > would be to make cdboot serial-console capable? (I'm not a C
> > programmer, I
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:37:26 +0200, Jonathan McKeown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While you're enhancing cdboot anyway, can I ask how complicated it
> would be to make cdboot serial-console capable? (I'm not a C
> programmer, I'm a sysadmin - but I'd be prepared to try and look at
> this myself if
While you're enhancing cdboot anyway, can I ask how complicated it would be to
make cdboot serial-console capable? (I'm not a C programmer, I'm a sysadmin -
but I'd be prepared to try and look at this myself if no-one else is
interested).
As it stands, the only way I've found to do a serial-con
On Monday 08 December 2008 06:51:19 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:40:41PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Below please find patch that enhances cdboot with two compile-time
options:
> ...
> > Any comments/suggestions are appreciated. If there are no objections I
>
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 04:29:04PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
4. another nitpick -- the value you pass in %si to the MBR does not
seem to point to anything useful. As discussed about boot0.S and
the followup in the mailing lists, there seems to be
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 04:29:04PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> >4. another nitpick -- the value you pass in %si to the MBR does not
> > seem to point to anything useful. As discussed about boot0.S and
> > the followup in the mailing lists, there seems to be no standar
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:29:04 -0800, Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:40:41PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Below please find patch that enhances cdboot with two compile-time options:
>> ...
>>> Any comments/suggestions are appreci
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:40:41PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
Below please find patch that enhances cdboot with two compile-time options:
...
Any comments/suggestions are appreciated. If there are no objections I
would like to commit the change. The long-term goal is t
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:40:41PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below please find patch that enhances cdboot with two compile-time options:
...
> Any comments/suggestions are appreciated. If there are no objections I
> would like to commit the change. The long-term goal is to make
> CDBOO
12 matches
Mail list logo
