On Friday 25 February 2005 04:39 am, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-Feb-24 17:59:19 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> >- kernel option support. How do we support vendor modules in a kernel
> >that might be compiled with PAE (rather common these days), SMP, MAC,
> >etc. The loader and /boot infrastru
On Thu, 2005-Feb-24 17:59:19 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>- kernel option support. How do we support vendor modules in a kernel
>that might be compiled with PAE (rather common these days), SMP, MAC,
>etc. The loader and /boot infrastructure has no concept of this. It's
>highly important, though.
A
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:14, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : I think PORTS_MODULES is a little suboptimal..
>
> How so?
If you upgrade your ports tree and then rebuild your kernel you may upgrade a
port KLD without wanting to.
> : Fx5200 Go). It also means that the kernel build/install does not result
>
[[ don't cc freebsd-hackers@ and hackers@ ]]
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:39, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > One does not need to patch the source tree at to pick up ports modules
: > for a kernel rebuild. One can bu
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:39, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> One does not need to patch the source tree at to pick up ports modules
> for a kernel rebuild. One can build the ports modules as part of the
> kernel by simply defining PORTS_MODULES in a kernel config file. In
> addition, one can specify absolu
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: - runtime support. Where will modules be put, how will they be ensured
: to not collide with the base system modules, and how will the system
: ensure that they get loaded on every boot. Most of the pieces are in
6 matches
Mail list logo
