Well, to tell the truth I wasn't that thrilled with the results. I didn't
[snip]
--
Compiling vbox/vbox-devel with gcc43
1) /usr/include/cam/cam.h needed #include for FILE define,
complained by:
[snip]
and /etc/src
On Thursday 01 April 2010 16:53:36 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Mario Lobo wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > It's compiling right now.
> > >
> > > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> > > after the next reboo
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Mario Lobo wrote:
> > [...]
> > It's compiling right now.
> >
> > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> after
> > the next reboot.
>
> So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
> if the ne
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Mario Lobo wrote:
> > [...]
> > It's compiling right now.
> >
> > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> > after the next reboot.
>
> So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
> if the ne
Mario Lobo wrote:
> [...]
> It's compiling right now.
>
> I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after
> the next reboot.
So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
if the new gcc version will really make a significant
difference.
Best regards
On 03/26/2010 12:47, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> jhell writes:
>> Jille Timmermans writes:
>>> I tried building world with it; but it doesn't seem to work :(
>>>
>>> [q...@istud /usr/src]$ CFLAGS="-Wno-error -Garrett" make buildworld
>>> [snip]
>>> cc: unrecognized option '-Garrett'
>>>
>>> ;)
>
On Friday 26 March 2010 13:01:21 Jille Timmermans wrote:
> Op 25-3-2010 18:31, Garrett Cooper schreef:
> > -Wno-error .
> > -Garrett
>
> I tried building world with it; but it doesn't seem to work :(
>
> [q...@istud /usr/src]$ CFLAGS="-Wno-error -Garrett" make buildworld
> [snip]
> cc: unrecogniz
Op 26-3-2010 17:17, jhell schreef:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:01, Jille Timmermans wrote:
In Message-Id: <4bacb021.9000...@quis.cx>
Op 25-3-2010 18:31, Garrett Cooper schreef:
-Wno-error .
-Garrett
I tried building world with it; but it doesn't seem to work :(
[q...@istud /usr/src]$ CFLAGS="-W
jhell writes:
> Jille Timmermans writes:
> > I tried building world with it; but it doesn't seem to work :(
> >
> > [q...@istud /usr/src]$ CFLAGS="-Wno-error -Garrett" make buildworld
> > [snip]
> > cc: unrecognized option '-Garrett'
> >
> > ;)
> ROFL I sure hope your kidding!
No, he's from a co
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:17 AM, jhell wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:01, Jille Timmermans wrote:
> In Message-Id: <4bacb021.9000...@quis.cx>
>
>> Op 25-3-2010 18:31, Garrett Cooper schreef:
>>>
>>> -Wno-error .
>>> -Garrett
>>>
>> I tried building world with it; but it doesn't seem to work :(
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:01, Jille Timmermans wrote:
In Message-Id: <4bacb021.9000...@quis.cx>
Op 25-3-2010 18:31, Garrett Cooper schreef:
-Wno-error .
-Garrett
I tried building world with it; but it doesn't seem to work :(
[q...@istud /usr/src]$ CFLAGS="-Wno-error -Garrett" make buildworld
[
Op 25-3-2010 18:31, Garrett Cooper schreef:
-Wno-error .
-Garrett
I tried building world with it; but it doesn't seem to work :(
[q...@istud /usr/src]$ CFLAGS="-Wno-error -Garrett" make buildworld
[snip]
cc: unrecognized option '-Garrett'
;)
-- Jille
__
On Thursday 25 March 2010 19:12:09 Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. 17:24:
> > 2010/3/24 Mario Lobo
> >
> >> Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel
> >> with gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting s
Wiadomość napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. 17:24:
> 2010/3/24 Mario Lobo
>>
>> Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel with
>> gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my league?
This is what I use to compile kernel on 9.0-CU
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:18:34PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> All right !! Thanks for replying !
>
> There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is
> enabled
> How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for
> world/kernel?
> will this "damage" the r
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:24:10 +0200, Mario Lobo wrote:
Should I just dump the gcc43 idea and try this with clang/llvm?
I've seen http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang.
Anything else to watch out for when building world/kernel/ports?
ClangBSD had little to no runtime testing, so you
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> 2010/3/25 Ryan Stone
>
>> If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own
>> build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the
>> gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so
-Wnoerror should disable it, but I don't know enough about the FreeBSD
build infrastructure to tell you where it needs to go. Worst comes to
worst you can just delete all of the -Werrors.
Disabling -Werror will not cause any problems. -Werror means "treat
warnings as errors". It's very useful f
2010/3/25 Ryan Stone
> If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own
> build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the
> gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so
> until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warn
If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own
build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the
gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so
until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warnings you won't
be able to build
2010/3/24 Mario Lobo
> Hi;
>
> I followed the instructions from
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
>
> to see if I can achieve some performance gain (8-STABLE r205630 amd64) and
> also get a more modern instruction set for my Phenom II (amdfam10), so I've
> done the
21 matches
Mail list logo
