On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:09:27PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 21-08-2012 17:04, Dan McGregor wrote:
> > My solution is certainly fairly hacky, I just took inspiration from
> > NetBSD. I wanted to see if it could be done. While I was there I did
> > identify several files that should be com
I can't speak for Tijl, but being able to build anything simply by
passing -m32 to the compiler is my goal.
Did your Intel EFI work involve #defining _KERNEL anywhere?
On 22 August 2012 16:04, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> I ran into some bugs compiling things with -m32 in the intel EFI work. As
> th
On 22 August 2012 14:09, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 21-08-2012 17:04, Dan McGregor wrote:
>> My solution is certainly fairly hacky, I just took inspiration from
>> NetBSD. I wanted to see if it could be done. While I was there I did
>> identify several files that should be common between i386 and
On 21-08-2012 17:04, Dan McGregor wrote:
> My solution is certainly fairly hacky, I just took inspiration from
> NetBSD. I wanted to see if it could be done. While I was there I did
> identify several files that should be common between i386 and amd64,
> such as exec.h.
>
> Since reading your em
On Aug 21, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 08/21/12 08:44, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:49:30 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang'
How do the unified powerpc headers work? Is it just one architecture
for both PowerPC and 64 bit PowerPC? If so, was that tijl's ultimate
goal? One architecture for i386 and AMD64?
On the unifying headers front, I've make a bunch of progress towards
merging i386 and amd64 headers into x86; also
On 08/21/12 08:44, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:49:30 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it buil
I think I agree now. The more code shared between archtectures the
better. I've committed some patches to my github freebsd fork that
merge exec.h, asm.h and ucontex.h into x86. I'll probably do more
later tonight.
On 21 August 2012 07:44, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:49
My solution is certainly fairly hacky, I just took inspiration from
NetBSD. I wanted
to see if it could be done. While I was there I did identify several
files that should be
common between i386 and amd64, such as exec.h.
Since reading your email I started looking at the x86 common code, and
have
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:49:30 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
> > sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it building and it
> > appears t
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
> sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it building and it
> appears to work properly, however the build system expects to be able
> to build 32 bit
On 08/21/12 09:32 AM, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it building and it
appears to work properly, however the build system expects to be able
to build 32 bit binaries on amd64.
amd64 doe
12 matches
Mail list logo
