Re: 6to4, stf and shoebox NAT routers

2007-08-29 Thread Lapo Luchini
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > lapo> Does you patch address incoming packets too? > > Yes, it should address incoming packets. > [...] > How do you configure your stf interface? You need to assign a 6to4 > address which is derived from the IPv4 global address assigned to the > NAT box. > And you need to

Re: 6to4, stf and shoebox NAT routers

2007-08-05 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:08:48 +0200 > Lapo Luchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: lapo> Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > I posted my proposed patch to current@ for review in the past. But, > no one responded. Could you test this? This is for 6-CURRENT at Feb 1. > If it doesn't apply cleanly, pl

Re: 6to4, stf and shoebox NAT routers

2007-08-03 Thread Lapo Luchini
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > I posted my proposed patch to current@ for review in the past. But, > no one responded. Could you test this? This is for 6-CURRENT at Feb 1. > If it doesn't apply cleanly, please let me know. It applied cleanly to 6.2-STABLE and seems to work perfectly... outbound at lea

Re: 6to4, stf and shoebox NAT routers

2005-03-12 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:24:52 -0800 > Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nsayer> Well, I'm screwed. nsayer> I set up the Linksys router so that the FreeBSD machine is the "DMZ" nsayer> host on the inside. Sending 6to4 to the router's outside address nsayer> results in tcpdump sh

Re: 6to4, stf and shoebox NAT routers

2005-03-11 Thread Nick Sayer
Well, I'm screwed. I set up the Linksys router so that the FreeBSD machine is the "DMZ" host on the inside. Sending 6to4 to the router's outside address results in tcpdump showing these on the inside: 22:09:36.138924 [linksys mac address] > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype ARP (0x0806), length 60:

Re: 6to4, stf and shoebox NAT routers

2005-03-11 Thread Nick Sayer
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: I posted my proposed patch to current@ for review in the past. But, no one responded. Could you test this? This is for 6-CURRENT at Feb 1. If it doesn't apply cleanly, please let me know. Domo arigato gozaimasu! It had fuzz when applied to 5.3-RELEASE, but it did apply.

Re: 6to4, stf and shoebox NAT routers

2005-03-11 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:19:59 -0800 > Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nsayer> I've come up with the attached patch. It simply allows you to optionally nsayer> neuter the RFC-1918 checks. The problem is that there are some instances nsayer> where those checks would still be g

Re: 6to4, stf and shoebox NAT routers

2005-03-11 Thread Nick Sayer
Turns out there is also a check in stf_output that I need to neuter for this configuration. Attached is a revised patch. --- net/if_stf.c.orig Thu Jul 15 01:26:06 2004 +++ net/if_stf.cFri Mar 11 15:05:52 2005 @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #i