On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 11:55:49AM -0400, David E. Cross wrote:
>
> Well, this is my current config: Dual P2-400, 256M RAM, 256M SWAP, 3.2-BETA,
> maxusers 256. I have yet to have any wierdness. Note we also run servers
> based off of the late 3.1-STABLE branch and we *used* to see KVA problems
> > > has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> > > prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
> > >
> > > Can somebody be more specific? I'm just about to order a really, really
> > > expensive machine and I want to be sure I can get it to
On Fri, 14 May 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
> > It's been noted on several occasions that with large (> 256MB) of RAM, one
> > has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> > prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
> >
> > Can somebody be m
Chuck Youse writes:
> It's been noted on several occasions that with large (> 256MB) of RAM, one
> has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
It's not a problem as long as your kernel address space
> It's been noted on several occasions that with large (> 256MB) of RAM, one
> has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
>
> Can somebody be more specific? I'm just about to order a really, really
5 matches
Mail list logo
