Re: [patch] somebody please fix this outstanding mmap(2) bug

2010-03-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 22 March 2010 3:46:53 pm Alexander Best wrote: > John Baldwin schrieb am 2010-03-22: > > On Monday 22 March 2010 11:07:43 am Alexander Best wrote: > > > could somebody please commit this patch? it's been around forever > > > (2003 or > > > 2004) and fixes mmap so the offset argument is be

Re: [patch] somebody please fix this outstanding mmap(2) bug

2010-03-22 Thread Alexander Best
John Baldwin schrieb am 2010-03-22: > On Monday 22 March 2010 11:07:43 am Alexander Best wrote: > > could somebody please commit this patch? it's been around forever > > (2003 or > > 2004) and fixes mmap so the offset argument is being ignored when > > MAP_ANON > is > > defined (just like the mmap(

Re: [patch] somebody please fix this outstanding mmap(2) bug

2010-03-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 22 March 2010 11:07:43 am Alexander Best wrote: > could somebody please commit this patch? it's been around forever (2003 or > 2004) and fixes mmap so the offset argument is being ignored when MAP_ANON is > defined (just like the mmap(2) manual says). right now the offset argument is >

Re: [patch] somebody please fix this outstanding mmap(2) bug

2010-03-22 Thread Alexander Best
oops. forgot the patch. ;) -- Alexander Best Index: sys/vm/vm_mmap.c === --- sys/vm/vm_mmap.c(revision 205390) +++ sys/vm/vm_mmap.c(working copy) @@ -241,19 +241,23 @@ ((prot & (PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE)) !=