Re: [hackers] Writing a PCI ADSL Driver

2002-10-10 Thread Taavi Talvik
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > I'm sure that if we drive the 3060 as a NATM interface, we can write generic > netgraph code to attach to a link layer ATM interface and examine inbound > ATM UNI cells for their VPI*VCI and act accordingly. > > This will certainly require ngatm and i

Re: [hackers] Writing a PCI ADSL Driver

2002-10-09 Thread Taavi Talvik
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 06:48 PM, Taavi Talvik wrote: > > > > Problem with ADSL is that there are actually too many link layer > > encapsualtions in use - PPPoE, PPPoA, plain rfc1348 (if i remember > > rfc number correctly) etc. > > This R

Re: [hackers] Writing a PCI ADSL Driver

2002-10-09 Thread float
On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 06:48 PM, Taavi Talvik wrote: > > Problem with ADSL is that there are actually too many link layer > encapsualtions in use - PPPoE, PPPoA, plain rfc1348 (if i remember > rfc number correctly) etc. This RFC defines the format of two new Resource Records (RRs) fo

Re: [hackers] Writing a PCI ADSL Driver

2002-10-06 Thread Taavi Talvik
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, David Gilbert wrote: > Neal> Hi there. I'm thinking of writing a device driver for a > Neal> Traverse Pulsar PCI ADSL card and I was looking for some ideas > Neal> before I committed myself. I've been offered hardware and > Neal> support by the makers (http://www.traverse.com.