On Saturday 05 August 2006 07:18, you wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've noticed that FreeBSD does not by default comply to RFC 919, Chapter
> > 7 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc919). Specifically, it does not handle
> > IP packets with a destination address o
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that FreeBSD does not by default comply to RFC 919, Chapter 7
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc919). Specifically, it does not handle IP
packets with a destination address of 255.255.255.255 properly.
255.255.255.255 is a "limited
>This PR is in the works and I have produced a first (non-working unfortunately)
>patch some time ago. I've just come back from two+half week vacation and have
>to catch up to things again. It is not forgotten.
Ok :)
Thanks for your work!
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
_
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
I found a discussion from 2003 about this, but it seems to have trailed off
without coming to a conclusion:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2003-July/000921.html
I've opened a similar PR
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/99558
This PR i
>I found a discussion from 2003 about this, but it seems to have trailed off
>without coming to a conclusion:
>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2003-July/000921.html
I've opened a similar PR
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/99558
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
_
Hello,
I've noticed that FreeBSD does not by default comply to RFC 919, Chapter 7
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc919). Specifically, it does not handle IP
packets with a destination address of 255.255.255.255 properly.
255.255.255.255 is a "limited broadcast address" (the term is not mentioned
6 matches
Mail list logo
