for certain
advanced features will be tackled. Both the RX and the TX side are
part of this project.
--
Andre
-Original Message-
From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:18 PM
To: Orit Moskovich
Cc: Konstantin Belousov; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: R
[trimmed cc]
on 27/05/2013 15:29 Orit Moskovich said the following:
>>From what I've read in subr_taskqueue.c taskqueue_swi, taskqueue_swi_giant
>>and taskqueue_fast are all implemented using swi_add which calls
>>ithread_create().
> Is there any performance difference between them. Is one of t
n the other?
-Original Message-
From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:18 PM
To: Orit Moskovich
Cc: Konstantin Belousov; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: preemptive kernel
on 27/05/2013 10:21 Orit Moskovich said the following:
> What is actually
described earlier.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 10:11 AM
> To: Konstantin Belousov
> Cc: Orit Moskovich; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: preemptive kernel
>
> on 27/05/2013 09:34 Konstant
From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 10:11 AM
To: Konstantin Belousov
Cc: Orit Moskovich; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: preemptive kernel
on 27/05/2013 09:34 Konstantin Belousov said the following:
> Having both filter and ithread for the same inte
on 27/05/2013 09:34 Konstantin Belousov said the following:
> Having both filter and ithread for the same interrupt is apparently
> possible but weird. I do not see anything which would prevent interrupt
> filter from being executed while the ithread is running. But again, this
> is very unusual
;
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 06:48 PM
> To: Orit Moskovich
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: preemptive kernel
>
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:09:03AM +, Orit Moskovich wrot
d.org
Subject: Re: preemptive kernel
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:09:03AM +, Orit Moskovich wrote:
> Can a filter routine preempt another filter routine? And can an interrupt
> thread (or a filter routine) preempt another ithread?
Filter handler borrows the context from the thread executed
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:09:03AM +, Orit Moskovich wrote:
> Can a filter routine preempt another filter routine? And can an interrupt
> thread (or a filter routine) preempt another ithread?
Filter handler borrows the context from the thread executed at the
time of the interrupt. At least o
Can a filter routine preempt another filter routine? And can an interrupt
thread (or a filter routine) preempt another ithread?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send an
Thanks John,
That is helpful.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:33 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, March 22, 2013 4:10:16 pm vasanth rao naik sabavat wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > Just to clarify, is the kernel pre-emption involuntary?
> >
> > Let say I have a kernel thread processing a huge list of
On Friday, March 22, 2013 4:10:16 pm vasanth rao naik sabavat wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Just to clarify, is the kernel pre-emption involuntary?
>
> Let say I have a kernel thread processing a huge list of entries, would
> this thread get involuntarily context switched out because of kernel
> preemp
Hi Adrian,
Just to clarify, is the kernel pre-emption involuntary?
Let say I have a kernel thread processing a huge list of entries, would
this thread get involuntarily context switched out because of kernel
preemption?
What is the time slice after which a kernel thread can involuntarily
context
Yes.
Adrian
On 22 March 2013 12:09, vasanth rao naik sabavat
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the FreeBSD-10 kernel preemptive?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Vasanth
> ___
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hacker
14 matches
Mail list logo
