Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Koen Martens wrote:
>
>> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
>>
>>
>> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>> cpuid = 1; apic id = 06
>> fault virtual address = 0x24
>> fault code = supervisor read, page not present
>> instr
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Koen Martens wrote:
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 06
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Koen Martens wrote:
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 06
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc051c253
stack poin
Robert Watson wrote:
> I can't speak to the problem with the core dumps, as it sounds like that
> is device/firmware related. However, I probably can lend a hand in
> debugging the problems you're seeing.
I don't think the dump problem is device/firmware related, as a
reboot -d gives me a dump j
On Monday 19 September 2005 03:35 pm, Koen Martens wrote:
> Vinod Kashyap wrote:
> > You seem to be booting off of a 9000 (twa) controller and not 7000/8000
> > (twe).
> > It could be because of a 9000 firmware bug that you are not being able
> > to
> > get the dump. The firmware wrongly interpret
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Koen Martens wrote:
Without the debug stuff in the kernel, it crashed within 2 days, same
story: postgresql process, function propagate_priority. However, no dump
was written to disk :(
Furthermore, i've been seeing the same crash (in propagate_priority) on
another box
Vinod Kashyap wrote:
> You seem to be booting off of a 9000 (twa) controller and not 7000/8000
> (twe).
> It could be because of a 9000 firmware bug that you are not being able
> to
> get the dump. The firmware wrongly interprets physical address 0x0 as
> invalid
> during dumps, and fails the oper
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Koen Martens writes:
> > (Note: swap is 2048mb, physical memory is also 2048mb).
> IIRC swap has to be a little (64kB?) bigger than memory because the
> kernel writes a header containing necessary information about the
> dump to sw
Koen Martens writes:
> (Note: swap is 2048mb, physical memory is also 2048mb).
>
IIRC swap has to be a little (64kB?) bigger than memory because the
kernel writes a header containing necessary information about the
dump to swap.
---
Gary Jennejohn / garyjATjennejohnDOTorg gjATfreebsdDOTorg garyj
Vinod Kashyap wrote:
> You seem to be booting off of a 9000 (twa) controller and not 7000/8000
> (twe).
> It could be because of a 9000 firmware bug that you are not being able
> to
> get the dump. The firmware wrongly interprets physical address 0x0 as
> invalid
> during dumps, and fails the oper
On Thursday 01 September 2005 06:04 pm, Koen Martens wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 September 2005 01:02 pm, Koen Martens wrote:
> >>I've had a little chat with neologism on ircnet/#freebsd about this
> >>already, and done as he suggested: compile a debug kernel to obtain
> >>a sta
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Koen Martens
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 3:11 PM
> To: Dimitry Andric
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: panic in propagate_priority w/ postgresql under
>
Hi Dim,
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2005-09-01 at 19:02:06 Koen Martens wrote:
>
>>Anyway, it seems the dump should've gone to the swap partition, but
>>i'm into multi-user mode again so i guess i'll have to wait for
>>another panic to obtain it?
>
> In RELENG_6, the dump device is chosen automa
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2005 01:02 pm, Koen Martens wrote:
>
>>I've had a little chat with neologism on ircnet/#freebsd about this
>>already, and done as he suggested: compile a debug kernel to obtain
>>a stack trace.
>
> Can you reproduce it with a kernel that has INVARIAN
On 2005-09-01 at 19:02:06 Koen Martens wrote:
> Anyway, it seems the dump should've gone to the swap partition, but
> i'm into multi-user mode again so i guess i'll have to wait for
> another panic to obtain it?
Yes. By now, if any dump was ever written to your swap partition, it
will most proba
On Thursday 01 September 2005 01:02 pm, Koen Martens wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> I've had a little chat with neologism on ircnet/#freebsd about this
> already, and done as he suggested: compile a debug kernel to obtain
> a stack trace.
Can you reproduce it with a kernel that has INVARIANTS and INVARI
16 matches
Mail list logo
