On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> (I assume I'm replying to the "real" PHK here)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > We know that the lamer behind the Troll is "Bill Huey" aka "billh".
>
> Is there any evidence for it? If so, you should share it and if not,
> you shouldn't make such accusa
Dave Hayes wrote:
> Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do you unsubscribe from mailing lists you merely monitor for
> > interesting content, rather than subscribing to them, when some
> > jerk fills up your POP3 maildrop because they have an axe to
> > grind, and, as a result, mail which
to quote the freebsd-current dmesg:
Be nice to each other, mmmkay?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Terry Lambert wrote something here:
> ...
Thanks for getting me to roll my eyes. They needed a workout after staring
at code.
Don
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
oceanare pte ltd wrote:
> Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
> > I don't know who he is either, but much to my regret this nonsense has
> > forced me off the list.
>
> Talk about beeing sensitive.
>
> I do not stop walking on streets despite the fact that some people
> get robbed there.
Do you unsubscrib
Hi,
Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
I don't know who he is either, but much to my regret this nonsense has
forced me off the list.
Talk about beeing sensitive.
I do not stop walking on streets despite the fact that some people
get robbed there.
Erich
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
I don't know who he is either, but much to my regret this nonsense has
forced me off the list.
Bye everyone, it's been a great 9 years, and it's a great OS, and you're
great people!
I hope this mess gets worked out someday.
ron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscrib
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:06:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> We know that the lamer behind the Troll is "Bill Huey" aka "billh".
FWIW if you or someone else can establish guilt in this matter, it is
actionable under 18 USC Sec. 1028[0]. If I were the real Matt Dillon I
would call my lo
Rahul Siddharthan writes:
> (I assume I'm replying to the "real" PHK here)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > We know that the lamer behind the Troll is "Bill Huey" aka "billh".
>
> Is there any evidence for it? If so, you should share it and if not,
> you shouldn't make such accusations.
He admitte
(I assume I'm replying to the "real" PHK here)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We know that the lamer behind the Troll is "Bill Huey" aka "billh".
Is there any evidence for it? If so, you should share it and if not,
you shouldn't make such accusations.
In message <00af01c2d04a$e948e0e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matthew Emmerton" w
rites:
>These messages aren't from the *real* Matt Dillon, they're from a stupid
>troll who has been impersonating various FreeBSD developers for a few months
>now. This particular troll uses anonymous remailers so the post
Hi Again,
please take my apologizes, especially Matthew, I am rather new to FreeBSD
- not in therms of using but reading the lists etc - and I just was
disappointed a lot, because a had to see, that there is sadly no
big difference between IRC and the freebsd mailing lists.
I know, one can't do ve
well it really figures, here we going with another pissing contest
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/03/239238&mode=thread&tid=122&tid=1
56
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Friedemann Becker
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 8:40 AM
At 15:40 09/02/2003 +0100, Friedemann Becker wrote:
I don't know, who this mathew dillon guy really is, or how important he is
for the FreeBSD project, but I don't think, he should be on any of the
freebsd mailing lists or any related facilities, if he just can't keep
with some of the most basic r
These messages aren't from the *real* Matt Dillon, they're from a stupid
troll who has been impersonating various FreeBSD developers for a few months
now. This particular troll uses anonymous remailers so the postmaster is
helpless to block email addresses or IP ranges.
So, if the message looks l
> I know I am not the first one thinking this way, the replies will probably
> be the same as every time before.
>
> Please accept my apologizes if I should hit the wrong person, but someone
> really does not behave in a acceptable way here and I just wanted to
> complain about it, to let people k
16 matches
Mail list logo
