Re: jail + mount_union problem

2002-03-26 Thread Terry Lambert
Vadim Kolontsov wrote: > > Good morning, > > So UNIONFS is broken in 4.5? Is it fixed in -STABLE? In -CURRENT? There are two types of "union"; one is intrinsic, and one is a seperate FS type. There are also uncommitted patches that have been sitting around for a while now. -- Terry To Unsu

Re: jail + mount_union problem

2002-03-26 Thread Dominic Marks
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:16:45PM +0300, Vadim Kolontsov wrote: > > I dont believe union should be used anywhere. Its broken, its > > always been broken (withinn the context of FreeBSD). > > As far as I know that hasn't changed recently. Read `man mount_union`. > > Surely I read it. But what's

RE: jail + mount_union problem

2002-03-26 Thread Vadim Kolontsov
> I dont believe union should be used anywhere. Its broken, its > always been broken (withinn the context of FreeBSD). > As far as I know that hasn't changed recently. Read `man mount_union`. Surely I read it. But what's about PR docs/30253 and kern/27250? Best regards, Vadim. To Unsubscribe

Re: jail + mount_union problem

2002-03-26 Thread Dominic Marks
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:04:57PM +0300, Vadim Kolontsov wrote: > Good morning, > > So UNIONFS is broken in 4.5? Is it fixed in -STABLE? In -CURRENT? I dont believe union should be used anywhere. Its broken, its always been broken (withinn the context of FreeBSD). As far as I know that hasn't

RE: jail + mount_union problem

2002-03-26 Thread Vadim Kolontsov
Good morning, So UNIONFS is broken in 4.5? Is it fixed in -STABLE? In -CURRENT? Best regards, Vadim. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: jail + mount_union problem

2002-03-26 Thread Terry Lambert
Victor Polyakov wrote: > Unfortunately, NULLFS filesystem does not permit users to modify files. > We want do give each user a copy of /usr and to permit installation of > software etc... You mean "on a per user basis". It permits modification. In general, you would mount / and /usr read-on

Re: jail + mount_union problem

2002-03-25 Thread Victor Polyakov
Unfortunately, NULLFS filesystem does not permit users to modify files. We want do give each user a copy of /usr and to permit installation of software etc... Victor Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Hello, > > > We have a system with some jails. First jail's home directory is > > /dat

Re: jail + mount_union problem

2002-03-25 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > We have a system with some jails. First jail's home directory is > /data/jails/ref. Then, we are running script "crash" under root: > May be anybody knows solution for this problem? Try NULLFS. It works for me. See my previous post on this. (NULLFS was in the subject) [ Free