On Monday January 15, 2001 20:50, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 16-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
> > On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 16:00:55 -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 15-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
> >>> On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 13:40:38 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp
wrote:
> There is one point w
On 16-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 16:00:55 -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 15-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
>>> On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 13:40:38 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
That f
On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 16:00:55 -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 15-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 13:40:38 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>>
>>> There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
>>>
>>> That fat little penguin is everywhere.
>>>
>>>
On 15-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 13:40:38 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
>>
>> That fat little penguin is everywhere.
>>
>> The main reason we practically don't see beastie at all is that
>> there is
Terry Lambert wrote:
[snippage]
> > exactly. this does not happen if I run this program from tcsh
> > (but does if I run from bash 1.14.7(1) built from ports
> > thanks!
> All in all, bash is pretty buggy.
The originator already stated that the bug doesn't appear in bash 2.
Using bash
> > } > what is FD 4?
> > }
> > } I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
> >
> > It might be something that the shell forgets to close, so it will be
> > dependent on which shell you use.
>
> exactly. this does not happen if I run this program from tcsh
> (but does if I run from bash 1.
hi, there!
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Don Lewis wrote:
> } > > No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything
> } > > anymore.
> }
> } > Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it should
> } > be nuked, IMHO.
> }
> } people still use it because it is smaller
> } o
-On [20001108 12:10], Max Khon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip spurious fd problem]
>as for me -- I do not try to hunt bugs in bash1 and do not blame it.
>my question was about unclosed pipe
Which seems to me, after X people tested the same program under a host
of different shells, including b
On Nov 8, 5:06pm, Max Khon wrote:
} Subject: RE: daemon()
} hi, there!
}
} On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Koster, K.J. wrote:
}
} > > No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything
} > > anymore.
}
} > Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it shoul
hi, there!
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Koster, K.J. wrote:
> > No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything
> > anymore.
> Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it should
> be nuked, IMHO.
people still use it because it is smaller
obrien has already tried to remove
>
> No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything
> anymore.
>
Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it should
be nuked, IMHO.
Kees Jan
PS. Interesting to use the words "nuke" and "humble" in the same
sentence. I should go into politics.
==
Max Khon wrote:
>
> hi, there!
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> > } > what is FD 4?
> > }
> > } I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
> >
> > It might be something that the shell forgets to close, so it will be
> > dependent on which shell you use.
>
> exactly. this does n
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:24:19PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > what is FD 4?
> >
> > I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
>
> yes. I am running sample program under FreeBSD 4.2-BETA (31 Oct 2000)
As was already mentione
hi, there!
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Don Lewis wrote:
> } > what is FD 4?
> }
> } I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
>
> It might be something that the shell forgets to close, so it will be
> dependent on which shell you use.
exactly. this does not happen if I run this program from tcsh
hi, there!
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > what is FD 4?
>
> I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
yes. I am running sample program under FreeBSD 4.2-BETA (31 Oct 2000)
/fjoe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the b
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:41:19PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Max Khon wrote:
>
> > what is FD 4?
>
> I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
Me neither..
RELENG_4 here, but daemon() seems to be exactly the same across (supported)
releases. All fd's I
On Nov 7, 11:41pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
} Subject: Re: daemon()
}
}
} On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Max Khon wrote:
}
} > what is FD 4?
}
} I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
It might be something that the shell forgets to close, so it will be
dependent on which shell you u
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Max Khon wrote:
> what is FD 4?
I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
Andrew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
18 matches
Mail list logo
