Re: btx building error

2001-07-26 Thread Mike Smith
>bash-2.04$ as --version >GNU assembler 2.11 >... > What should I do? Uninstall your customised binutils. FreeBSD 4.x is using 2.10: ziplok:~>as --version GNU assembler 2.10.1 ziplok:~>uname -a FreeBSD ziplok.dis.org 4.3-STABLE FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE #0: Sat Jul 7 10:52:55 PDT 2001

Re: btx building error

2001-07-26 Thread Mike Smith
> I cvs'ed the current version of btx by "cvs co btx" and tried to build it on > my FBSD-4.0 box and here is what I got: ... >bash-2.04$ as --version >GNU assembler 2.11 ... > What should I do? Uninstall your custom binutils: ziplok:~>uname -r 4.3-STABLE ziplok:~>as --version GNU assemb

RE: btx building error

2001-07-24 Thread John Baldwin
On 25-Jul-01 Weiguang SHI wrote: > Wait a minute. I've got binutils 2.11, including as, which was the > most recent version that can be found at ftp.gnu.org. That is not the binutils on a 4.0-relesae box. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.

RE: btx building error

2001-07-24 Thread Weiguang SHI
Wait a minute. I've got binutils 2.11, including as, which was the most recent version that can be found at ftp.gnu.org. Thanks Weiguang >From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Weiguang SHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: btx building

RE: btx building error

2001-07-24 Thread John Baldwin
On 25-Jul-01 Weiguang SHI wrote: > Hi, > > I cvs'ed the current version of btx by "cvs co btx" and tried to build it on > my FBSD-4.0 box and here is what I got: The -current and 4.x-stable versions of BTX need the binutils (including assembler) in 4.1 or later. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROT