On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 04:57:54PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Kevin Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem is that 'fsck -py' ignores the 'p' and will fsck every time,
> > even if it's unneeded. This takes ages for me. I believe I submitted a PR
> > with a 'fix' to fsck.
>
> 'fs
Kevin Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that 'fsck -py' ignores the 'p' and will fsck every time,
> even if it's unneeded. This takes ages for me. I believe I submitted a PR
> with a 'fix' to fsck.
'fsck -p || fsck -y' should do the trick.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROT
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
:
: >The problem is that 'fsck -py' ignores the 'p' and will fsck every time,
: >even if it's unneeded. This takes ages for me. I believe I submitted a PR
: >with a 'fix' to fsck.
:
: According to the man page, fsck -y and fsck -p are two distincts commands.
Here's a pa
>The problem is that 'fsck -py' ignores the 'p' and will fsck every time,
>even if it's unneeded. This takes ages for me. I believe I submitted a PR
>with a 'fix' to fsck.
>Kevin
According to the man page, fsck -y and fsck -p are two distincts commands.
--
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 27-Oct-99 Remy Nonnenmacher wrote:
> > In followup of the FFS thread, I would like to know if there are some
> > recommendations for running unattended machines. For exemple, avoiding
> > the 'run fsck manually' (for exemple, when co-locating
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 27-Oct-99 Remy Nonnenmacher wrote:
> > In followup of the FFS thread, I would like to know if there are some
> > recommendations for running unattended machines. For exemple, avoiding
> > the 'run fsck manually' (for exemple, when co-locati
On 28-Oct-99 Kevin Day wrote:
> > This means that it generally always gets through the fsck.. Of course if
> > had to delete files then they're gone, but if you value its ability to stay
> > without human intervention its handy.
> The problem is that 'fsck -py' ignores the 'p' and will fsck ever
>
>
> On 27-Oct-99 Remy Nonnenmacher wrote:
> > In followup of the FFS thread, I would like to know if there are some
> > recommendations for running unattended machines. For exemple, avoiding
> > the 'run fsck manually' (for exemple, when co-locating a machine far
> > away where it is not p
On 27-Oct-99 Remy Nonnenmacher wrote:
> In followup of the FFS thread, I would like to know if there are some
> recommendations for running unattended machines. For exemple, avoiding
> the 'run fsck manually' (for exemple, when co-locating a machine far
> away where it is not possible to get
9 matches
Mail list logo
