RE: Re-inserting packets into firewall.

2000-05-28 Thread Dave Preece
Julian, Many thanks! > If you reinsert the packet and use the same sockaddr that > you received, > it should insert the packet at the first rule number GREATER THAN the > rule that diverted it. The rule number of diversion is stored in > the 'port' field of the sockaddr. Loud clang noise as

Re: Re-inserting packets into firewall.

2000-05-28 Thread Julian Elischer
Dave Preece wrote: > > I'm having a go at writing a 'component' in the firewall chain. The > component may, or may not, readdress the packet and therefore > I need to drop > it back into the chain at the next rule. this is how ipdivert should work.. If you reinsert the packet and use the same