RE: RE: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.

1999-08-03 Thread Alton, Matthew
, 1999 9:20 PM > To: Alton, Matthew > Cc: 'Nik Clayton'; David E. Cross; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: RE: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed. > > > :Anyway, Mr. Dillon, once I have a development box to smack around, I > :intend to start with

RE: RE: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.

1999-08-03 Thread Alton, Matthew
20 PM > To: Alton, Matthew > Cc: 'Nik Clayton'; David E. Cross; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RE: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed. > > > :Anyway, Mr. Dillon, once I have a development box to smack around, I > :intend to start with your suggestion of

Re: RE: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.

1999-07-30 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Anyway, Mr. Dillon, once I have a development box to smack around, I :intend to start with your suggestion of implementing a filesystem :of my own concoction by returning an error for all VOP calls and :issuing a kernel printf. How visible will the new VOP code be to :me at this level? The Peng

Re: RE: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.

1999-07-30 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Anyway, Mr. Dillon, once I have a development box to smack around, I :intend to start with your suggestion of implementing a filesystem :of my own concoction by returning an error for all VOP calls and :issuing a kernel printf. How visible will the new VOP code be to :me at this level? The Pen