On 13-Nov-99 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 03:49:31PM -0700, Alec Wolman wrote:
>> > Digital Unix, aka Compaq Tru64 Unix, formerly know as DEC OSF/1
>> > supports this syntax. In fact, this is the only syntax it
>> > supports,
>> > IIRC, so FreeBSD is not the only OS to use it.
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 03:49:31PM -0700, Alec Wolman wrote:
> > Digital Unix, aka Compaq Tru64 Unix, formerly know as DEC OSF/1
> > supports this syntax. In fact, this is the only syntax it supports,
> > IIRC, so FreeBSD is not the only OS to use it.
Ultrix was the one that only suported this s
Hi,
> warnx("WARNING: path@server syntax is deprecated, use server:path");
> before line 667 of /usr/src/sbin/mount_nfs.c. But I don't see anywhere
> where it differentiates between delimitors and path-components. It is
> just a simple strchr() and the first @ or : it finds is assumed the be
I'
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 12:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Proposal for the kill-list (userland nfs)
>
> On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> > > If you want to do this, I suggest a round of releases that have mount
> Digital Unix, aka Compaq Tru64 Unix, formerly know as DEC OSF/1
> supports this syntax. In fact, this is the only syntax it supports,
> IIRC, so FreeBSD is not the only OS to use it.
You are not correct when you state that this is the only syntax it
supports. Digital Unix does support the ho
:Not many people are aware that our userland mount_nfs(8) and umount(8)
:support the following NFS-URL-syntax:
:
:mount /some/path/to/directory@nfs-server /mntpoint
:
:This, however, seems to be BSD-specific. Neither Solaris, Linux, Irix
:...
:
:I propose to remove the '@' feature because of the a
On 05-Oct-99 Martin Blapp wrote:
> Not many people are aware that our userland mount_nfs(8) and
> umount(8)
> support the following NFS-URL-syntax:
>
> mount /some/path/to/directory@nfs-server /mntpoint
>
> This, however, seems to be BSD-specific. Neither Solaris, Linux, Irix
> or any other Ope
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Martin Blapp wrote:
> > If you want to do this, I suggest a round of releases that have mount
> > complain about the @ syntax before you kill it. POLA, you know.
> >
> > A complaint such as:
> >
> > WARNING: path@server syntax is deprecated, use server:path
> >
> > would be
> If you want to do this, I suggest a round of releases that have mount
> complain about the @ syntax before you kill it. POLA, you know.
>
> A complaint such as:
>
> WARNING: path@server syntax is deprecated, use server:path
>
> would be sufficient.
A good idea, but how can one make a differe
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Martin Blapp wrote:
> 1. Parsing a NFS-Path with directory-components which include ':'
> or '@' in their path gets difficult. To support it,
> mount_nfs(8) and umount(8) have to handle several exceptions:
>
> - nfs-server:/some@stupid/p@th
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
