RE: Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f

2007-07-19 Thread Helge.Oldach
Stephen Montgomery-Smith: > If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but > after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that > require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently messes up > programs like portmanager. There is a sense in wh

Re: Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f

2007-07-18 Thread Randy Pratt
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:56:49 -0500 (CDT) Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but > after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that > require the original port will be incorrect. This

Re: Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f

2007-07-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:56 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently me

Re: Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f

2007-07-18 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:56 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but > after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that > require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently messes up > progra