> :In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matt Dillon writes:
> :: : -b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159
> :: I think Bruce swears by 4K (page-sized) fragments. Not a bad
> :: way to go. I use 2K because I (and others) put in so much hard work
> :: to fix all the little niggling bugs in the VM system r
:On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 05:53:18AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:>
:> How frequently do people fsck?
:
:Once per reboot usually.
:
:Joe
:--
:Josef Karthauser [[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
No, that's an fsck -p ... if the filesystem is clean, it doesn't
do anything.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> How frequently do people fsck?
Well, that depends on whether I'm attached atm or not.
Oh, you mean filesystems? :-)
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The bronze landed last, w
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 05:53:18AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> How frequently do people fsck?
Once per reboot usually.
Joe
--
Josef Karthauser[[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
. FreeBSD: The power to change the world
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> How frequently do people fsck?
Only at boot time, or when problems surface.
Just my $.02
-Christoph Sold
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
How frequently do people fsck?
-- TJ
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
This is a interesting topic (to me, anyway), and is one of the things that
often gets overlooked by those of us with less experience. Rather than
getting into a long discussion about modifying the newfs defaults across
the board, what if the newfs options used were based on the size of
the FS? T
In the last episode (Dec 07), Matt Dillon said:
> Well, too-large a C/G will result in greater file fragmentation,
> because FFS can't manage the file layouts in the cylinder groups as
> well. The default of 16 is definitely too little. 100+ is probably
> too much. Something in the middle will
:
:In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matt Dillon writes:
:: :-b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159
:: I think Bruce swears by 4K (page-sized) fragments. Not a bad
:: way to go. I use 2K because I (and others) put in so much hard work
:: to fix all the little niggling bugs in the VM system relate
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matt Dillon writes:
: : -b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159
: I think Bruce swears by 4K (page-sized) fragments. Not a bad
: way to go. I use 2K because I (and others) put in so much hard work
: to fix all the little niggling bugs in the VM system related to pa
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The default filesystem parameters are:
>
> newfs -f 1024 -b 8192 -i 8192 -c 16 ...
-i 4096
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>> So far I don't see any indication here (or elsewhere) that anybody
>> has that grasp.
>>
>> I guess that is really a testimony to FFS/UFS's qualites...
>>
>> The main thing is that you significantly reduce your fsck time if
>> you redu
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 00:52] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>
> >I'd do it, but I don't really have a grasp on the optimal parameters
> >to set based on FS size.
>
> So far I don't see any indication here (or elsewhere) that anybody
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>I'd do it, but I don't really have a grasp on the optimal parameters
>to set based on FS size.
So far I don't see any indication here (or elsewhere) that anybody
has that grasp.
I guess that is really a testimony to FFS/UFS's qualites...
> It would be nice to up the default cylinders/group in sysinstall
> for larger partitions (anything over 8GB). I wouldn't up it to
> 159 as a default, but 32 would be a whole lot better then the
Well, if somebody wants to figure out the best defaults, they're
easily set in sysinstal
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 00:25] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>
> >> Right now I tend to use:
> >>
> >>-b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159
> >
> >I know you're pretty busy, but any chance of getting this into
> >sysinstall? Maybe hindged on the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>> Right now I tend to use:
>>
>> -b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159
>
>I know you're pretty busy, but any chance of getting this into
>sysinstall? Maybe hindged on the size of the partition?
sysinstall supports you changing the args to newfs,
:In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, A G F Keahan writes:
:>What parameters should I choose for a large (say, 60 or 80Gb)
:>filesystem? I remember a while ago someone (phk?) conducted a survey,
:>but nothing seems to have come of it. In the meantime, the capacity of
:>an average hard drive has inc
:>
:> Right now I tend to use:
:>
:> -b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159
:
:I know you're pretty busy, but any chance of getting this into
:sysinstall? Maybe hindged on the size of the partition?
:
:--
:-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
:"I have the heart of a child; I keep i
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 00:12] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, A G F Keahan writes:
> >What parameters should I choose for a large (say, 60 or 80Gb)
> >filesystem? I remember a while ago someone (phk?) conducted a survey,
> >but nothing seems to have come of it.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, A G F Keahan writes:
>What parameters should I choose for a large (say, 60 or 80Gb)
>filesystem? I remember a while ago someone (phk?) conducted a survey,
>but nothing seems to have come of it. In the meantime, the capacity of
>an average hard drive has increased
:That's because any "consensus" would be inappropriate for mass consumtion.
:It really depends on a lot of fun things like the average file size and the
:number of files that the drives will be storing. For example, a mail server
:might want more inodes than a database server. The mail server will
That's because any "consensus" would be inappropriate for mass consumtion.
It really depends on a lot of fun things like the average file size and the
number of files that the drives will be storing. For example, a mail server
might want more inodes than a database server. The mail server will lik
23 matches
Mail list logo
