On 2005-08-01 21:43, Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> GK> Yes, I like the change. I'm not an src-committer, so it is just an
> GK> informed opinion by someone who eats shell scripts for breakfast, so
> GK> feel free to ask the [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
GK> On 2005-08-01 20:50, Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GK> >On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Luis wrote:
GK> can anyone please point me why mdconfig method for tmpmfs is
GK> malloc-backed instead of swap-backed, and it is
On 2005-08-01 20:50, Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Luis wrote:
can anyone please point me why mdconfig method for tmpmfs is
malloc-backed instead of swap-backed, and it is hardcoded into
rc.subr?
Are swap-backed file system
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Luis wrote:
JCML> > > can anyone please point me why mdconfig method for tmpmfs is
JCML> > > malloc-backed instead of swap-backed, and it is hardcoded into
JCML> > > rc.subr?
JCML> > > Are swap-backed file systems so inefficient? If no, why not move -M to
J
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:41:24PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Dear colleagues,
can anyone please point me why mdconfig method for tmpmfs
is malloc-backed instead of swap-backed, and it is hardcoded into rc.subr?
Are swap-backed file systems so inefficient? If no, w
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:41:24PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> can anyone please point me why mdconfig method for tmpmfs
> is malloc-backed instead of swap-backed, and it is hardcoded into rc.subr?
>
> Are swap-backed file systems so inefficient? If no, why not move
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Deslions Nicolas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm trying to setup a 850Mb ramdrive but MFS seems limited ... i didn't
> found any way to do something bigger than 500Mb
>
> Any idea ?
You should increase "options MAXDSIZ=" in your kernel config file. See
LINT for further description.
**
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 06:12:16PM -0700, Nathaniel G H wrote:
> > Can one of you help me with a quick overview of what has happened
> > with the Memory File System since 4.4BSD to the FreeBSD that exists
> > today?
>
> Hi,
>
> I've never used it myself, but I read an article about it on
> the O
> Can one of you help me with a quick overview of what has happened
> with the Memory File System since 4.4BSD to the FreeBSD that exists
> today?
Hi,
I've never used it myself, but I read an article about it on
the O'Reilly network; hold on a sec while I look it up
http://www.oreillynet.co
9 matches
Mail list logo
