soon...
-James
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Watson
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 11:11 PM
> To: Wes Peters
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HomePNA network cards
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Dec 1999,
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> >
> > I submitted a pr in June with patches, and it seems to work fairly well.
> > Never checked to see if it was commited though. I've had problems with
>
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> >
> > I submitted a pr in June with patches, and it seems to work fairly well.
> > Never checked to see if it was commited though. I've had problems with
> > drop
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> I submitted a pr in June with patches, and it seems to work fairly well.
> Never checked to see if it was commited though. I've had problems with
> dropped packets, however--at certain times of day (?) I can'
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Has anyone gotten one of these to work with the lnc driver in current?
> Looking at the chip specs, it is supposed to be software compatible with
> the PCNet PCI parts, but it sports the "home networking" PHY that are
> not supported on other LANCE parts.
>
I have one here..
(and all the specs)
the code changes needed to thte lnc driver are:
1/ new PCI ID :-)
2/ BSD equivalent of the following linux code:
case 0x2626:
chipname = "PCnet/Home 79C978";
fdx = 1;
/*
* This is based on specs published at www.amd.com
6 matches
Mail list logo
