Re: R. Stevens select() Collisions Scenario

2000-08-11 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Jonas Bulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000811 10:45] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Yes. :) When FreeBSD gets scheduler activations you'll be able to change > > to a single threaded process that will have excellent performance, the > > scheduler activations are just around the corner. > > Can

Re: R. Stevens select() Collisions Scenario

2000-08-11 Thread Jonas Bulow
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Yes. :) When FreeBSD gets scheduler activations you'll be able to change > to a single threaded process that will have excellent performance, the > scheduler activations are just around the corner. Can you explain what scheduler activations are? To Unsubscribe: send m

Re: R. Stevens select() Collisions Scenario

2000-08-10 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Michael Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000810 17:51] wrote: > Purpose: > > I am trying to write a non-blocking, preforked server, specifically to > run on FreeBSD, and have a general question as to whether or not my > strategy is sound. > > > Problem: > > In Unix Network Programming Vol. 1 (sect

R. Stevens select() Collisions Scenario

2000-08-10 Thread Michael Owens
Purpose: I am trying to write a non-blocking, preforked server, specifically to run on FreeBSD, and have a general question as to whether or not my strategy is sound. Problem: In Unix Network Programming Vol. 1 (section 27.6, p.741), Stevens mentions a scenario under a preforked server design