Farooq Mela wrote:
> > cc -S is your friend.
>
> Right, well that can certainly help, but what gcc generates can be
> dependant on calling convention, optimization setting, &c &c, and
> though the code generated in one particular scenario may not be an
> absolute indicator of it's behavior. In ot
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> cc -S is your friend.
Right, well that can certainly help, but what gcc generates can be
dependant on calling convention, optimization setting, &c &c, and
though the code generated in one particular scenario may not be an
absolute indicator of it's behavior. In other wor
Farooq Mela wrote:
>
> Hi -hackers,
>
> I'm developing some assembly routines that are called from a C library
> under FreeBSD. Some of these routines do not return anything (ie,
> prototyped in C, their return type is 'void'). Does the compiler
> expect that the asm routines that don't return
Hi -hackers,
I'm developing some assembly routines that are called from a C library
under FreeBSD. Some of these routines do not return anything (ie,
prototyped in C, their return type is 'void'). Does the compiler
expect that the asm routines that don't return anything will preserve
the value
4 matches
Mail list logo
