> 'Alfred Perlstein' wrote:
>
>> int
>> sigchld_handler(int)
>> {
>>
>> while (waitpid(-1, NULL, 0) || errno == EINTR)
>> ;
>> }
actually, shouldn't you use WNOHANG when calling waitpid() there? What
I normally do is
int e = errno;
while (waitpid(-1, NULL,
* Ben Smithurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000825 10:15] wrote:
> 'Alfred Perlstein' wrote:
>
> > int
> > sigchld_handler(int)
> > {
> >
> > while (waitpid(-1, NULL, 0) || errno == EINTR)
> > ;
> > }
>
> Even more paranoid would be
>
> int
> sigchld_handler(int)
> {
> int e =
'Alfred Perlstein' wrote:
> int
> sigchld_handler(int)
> {
>
> while (waitpid(-1, NULL, 0) || errno == EINTR)
> ;
> }
Even more paranoid would be
int
sigchld_handler(int)
{
int e = errno;
while (waitpid(-1, NULL, 0) || errno == EINTR)
;
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 02:19:28PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi ix
> By definition zombie is a process entry in proc table that wasn't released
> by wait*() called form the parent's code. So all we need to do is to ensure
A zombie can only occur with a *live* parent. If the
* Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000825 05:59] wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > If a parent that has zombie children exits the kernel will attach them
> > to init (I haven't checked, but this is the common unix solution).
> > init will be calling waitpid to clear zombies automagi
> > I have some ideas to improve fork()-ing and getting rid of
> zombie processes.
> > This things mentioned here are proposed of a man that do
> not know very well
> > (author means 'the depths' of) BSD kernel source although
> he have some ex-
> > pirience with it (mainly in reading it :-).
>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000825 03:14] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some ideas to improve fork()-ing and getting rid of zombie processes.
> This things mentioned here are proposed of a man that do not know very well
> (author means 'the depths' of) BSD kernel source although he have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some ideas to improve fork()-ing and getting rid of zombie processes.
> This things mentioned here are proposed of a man that do not know very well
> (author means 'the depths' of) BSD kernel source although he have some ex-
> pirience with it (mainly
Hello,
I have some ideas to improve fork()-ing and getting rid of zombie processes.
This things mentioned here are proposed of a man that do not know very well
(author means 'the depths' of) BSD kernel source although he have some ex-
pirience with it (mainly in reading it :-).
By definition zom
9 matches
Mail list logo
