Re: Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-12-04 Thread Daniel Eischen
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 12:32] wrote: > > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > > * Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote: > > > > > > > > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads > > > > whose contexts are not saved as

Re: Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-12-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 12:32] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > * Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote: > > > > > > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads > > > whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt > > > (c

Re: Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-12-04 Thread Daniel Eischen
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote: > > > > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads > > whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt > > (ctxtype != CTX_UC). You shouldn't test for cancellation when > > ctxtype =

Re: Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-12-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 11:45] wrote: > * Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote: > > > > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads > > whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt > > (ctxtype != CTX_UC). You shouldn't test

Re: Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-12-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote: > > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads > whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt > (ctxtype != CTX_UC). You shouldn't test for cancellation when > ctxtype == CTX_UC because you are running on th

Re: Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-12-04 Thread Dan Eischen
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011130 16:17] wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Louis-Philippe Gagnon wrote: > > > If at first you don't succeed... > > > > > > I've encountered a problem using pthread_cancel, pthread_join and > > > pthread_setcanceltype, I'm hoping

Re: Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-12-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011130 16:17] wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Louis-Philippe Gagnon wrote: > > If at first you don't succeed... > > > > I've encountered a problem using pthread_cancel, pthread_join and > > pthread_setcanceltype, I'm hoping someone can shed some light. > > >

Re: Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-11-30 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Louis-Philippe Gagnon wrote: > If at first you don't succeed... > > I've encountered a problem using pthread_cancel, pthread_join and > pthread_setcanceltype, I'm hoping someone can shed some light. > > (in a nutshell : pthread_setcanceltype doesn't seem to work in FreeBSD

Possible libc_r pthread bug

2001-11-30 Thread Louis-Philippe Gagnon
If at first you don't succeed... I've encountered a problem using pthread_cancel, pthread_join and pthread_setcanceltype, I'm hoping someone can shed some light. (in a nutshell : pthread_setcanceltype doesn't seem to work in FreeBSD 4.4) (posted to -current and -hackers; if there's a more appr