On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jacques Fourie
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
>> Jacques,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
>> J> Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev 245286 is doing
>> the
>> J> right
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jacques Fourie
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
>> Jacques,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
>> J> Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev 245286 is doing
>> the
>> J> right
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Jacques,
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
> J> Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev 245286 is doing the
> J> right thing in the scenario where a mbuf chain is split with len0
> falling
>
Jacques,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
J> Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev 245286 is doing the
J> right thing in the scenario where a mbuf chain is split with len0 falling
J> on a mbuf boundary and the mbuf in question being a M_EXT mbuf? Con
Hi,
Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev 245286 is doing the
right thing in the scenario where a mbuf chain is split with len0 falling
on a mbuf boundary and the mbuf in question being a M_EXT mbuf? Consider
the following example where m0 is a mbuf chain consisting of 2 M_EXT mbufs
5 matches
Mail list logo