Re: Policy Routing / NAT Question

2003-06-11 Thread Ryan Wilkins
Hi.. thanks for your response.. it did exactly what I needed. I tried some of the other solutions provided earlier in the day and ended up locking up a machine 340 miles away from here which is a good 6-7 hour drive from where I am currently. Thanks again, Ryan Wilkins On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 14:

Re: Policy Routing / NAT Question

2003-06-11 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:55:53AM -0400, Ryan Wilkins wrote: > Hello.. > > I'm setting up a TCP protocol testbed for testing various enhanced TCP > stacks for use over high bandwidth, high latency links such as > Satellite. Due to hardware limitations of the FreeBSD boxes we're using > (1U rackm

Re: Policy Routing / NAT Question

2003-06-11 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Vlad GALU wrote: > > Satellite. Due to hardware limitations of the FreeBSD boxes we're > > using(1U rackmount), there are no expansion slots left for additional There are several 4, 6 and 8 port ethernet cards on the marked - which only take up one slot. I've also solved t

Re: Policy Routing / NAT Question

2003-06-11 Thread Vlad GALU
On 11 Jun 2003 08:55:53 -0400 Ryan Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello.. > > I'm setting up a TCP protocol testbed for testing various enhanced TCP > stacks for use over high bandwidth, high latency links such as > Satellite. Due to hardware limitations of the FreeBSD boxes we're > using(

Policy Routing / NAT Question

2003-06-11 Thread Ryan Wilkins
Hello.. I'm setting up a TCP protocol testbed for testing various enhanced TCP stacks for use over high bandwidth, high latency links such as Satellite. Due to hardware limitations of the FreeBSD boxes we're using (1U rackmount), there are no expansion slots left for additional network cards. Th