> I wouldn't focus on just anticipation, but also other types of
> schedulers (I/O scheduling influenced by nice value?)
One note on this subject: it will be nice for things like bg-fsck,
but it also brings up a point that has been overlooked so far:
priority propagation.
As far as I am aware, th
On 10/17/07, Fabio Checconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, Oct 17, 2007 03:09:35PM +0200
> >
> > On ons, okt 17, 2007 at 02:19:07 +0200, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> > > Maybe I've not enough experience/knowledge of the driver subsystem,
> [...]
>
> From: Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, Oct 17, 2007 03:09:35PM +0200
>
> On ons, okt 17, 2007 at 02:19:07 +0200, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> > Maybe I've not enough experience/knowledge of the driver subsystem,
[...]
> If you look at it, Hybrid is just a generalization of the existing
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:09:35PM +0200, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
... discussion on Hybrid vs. GEOM as a suitable location for
... pluggable disk schedulers
> However, I'd hate to see the Hybrid effort go to waste :) I was hoping some
> of the authors of the project would reply with their thoughts,
On ons, okt 17, 2007 at 02:19:07 +0200, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> > From: Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, Oct 17, 2007 01:07:15PM +0200
> >
> > On tir, okt 16, 2007 at 04:10:37 +0200, Karsten Behrmann wrote:
> > Over to a more general view of it's architecture:
> >
> > When I looke
> From: Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, Oct 17, 2007 01:07:15PM +0200
>
> On tir, okt 16, 2007 at 04:10:37 +0200, Karsten Behrmann wrote:
> Over to a more general view of it's architecture:
>
> When I looked at this project for the first time, I was under the impression
> that this
On tir, okt 16, 2007 at 04:10:37 +0200, Karsten Behrmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > is anybody working on the `Pluggable Disk Scheduler Project' from
> > the ideas page?
> I've been kicking the idea around in my head, but I'm probably newer to
> everything invo
> From: Karsten Behrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, Oct 16, 2007 04:10:37PM +0200
>
> > Hi,
> > is anybody working on the `Pluggable Disk Scheduler Project' from
> > the ideas page?
> I've been kicking the idea around in my head, but I'
> Hi,
> is anybody working on the `Pluggable Disk Scheduler Project' from
> the ideas page?
I've been kicking the idea around in my head, but I'm probably newer to
everything involved than you are, so feel free to pick it up. If you want,
we can toss some ideas and code
Quoting Fabio Checconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 11 Oct 2007
13:48:28 +0200):
From: Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Oct 11, 2007 10:07:34AM +0200
On tor, okt 11, 2007 at 04:20:01 +0200, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> o What can be an interface for disk schedulers?
I think t
> From: Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, Oct 12, 2007 08:18:35AM +0200
>
> Quoting Fabio Checconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 11 Oct 2007
> 13:48:28 +0200):
>
> >>From: Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Date: Thu, Oct 11, 2007 10:07:34AM +0200
> >>
> >>On tor, okt 11,
Hi,
> From: Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, Oct 11, 2007 10:07:34AM +0200
>
> On tor, okt 11, 2007 at 04:20:01 +0200, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> > o is working on disk scheduling worth at all?
> It is hard to say, but I'd like to run some benchmarks with this to see.
> Also, noted
On tor, okt 11, 2007 at 04:20:01 +0200, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> Hi,
> is anybody working on the `Pluggable Disk Scheduler Project' from
> the ideas page?
Hi,
I did look into it :) But then other projects came.
>
> To better understand how GEOM works, and how a (non wor
Hi,
is anybody working on the `Pluggable Disk Scheduler Project' from
the ideas page?
To better understand how GEOM works, and how a (non work conserving)
disk scheduler can fit into it, I've written a very simple, yet
working, prototype:
http://feanor.sssup.it/~fabio/freeb
14 matches
Mail list logo
