On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > I have also figured out how to dynamically register sysctl nodes.
> > > The trick is to basically malloc a sysctl_oid and fill in the right
> > > fi
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
>
> > I have also figured out how to dynamically register sysctl nodes.
> > The trick is to basically malloc a sysctl_oid and fill in the right
> > fields and calling sysctl_register_oid. The code is in a ker
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > I have also figured out how to dynamically register sysctl nodes.
> > > The trick is to basically malloc a sysctl_oid and fill in the right
> > > fields and calling sysctl_regis
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
>
> > I have also figured out how to dynamically register sysctl nodes.
> > The trick is to basically malloc a sysctl_oid and fill in the right
> > fields and calling sysctl_register_oid. The code is in a kernel
> > module availabl
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> I have also figured out how to dynamically register sysctl nodes.
> The trick is to basically malloc a sysctl_oid and fill in the right
> fields and calling sysctl_register_oid. The code is in a kernel
> module available from:
>
> http://sharmas.dhs.org/
At 11:41 AM -0800 12/17/99, Arun Sharma wrote:
>Arun Sharma wrote:
> >
> >
> > Here's a reimplementation of my earlier per cpu time keeping patch
> > on SMP. The attached patch is against a 11/20/99 -current that I
> > cvsup'ed.
>
>Did anyone get a chance to review this ? Is everyone busy or send
Arun Sharma wrote:
>
>
> Here's a reimplementation of my earlier per cpu time keeping patch
> on SMP. The attached patch is against a 11/20/99 -current that I
> cvsup'ed.
Did anyone get a chance to review this ? Is everyone busy or sending
patches to -hackers is frowned upon ? Or is this somet
Here's a reimplementation of my earlier per cpu time keeping patch
on SMP. The attached patch is against a 11/20/99 -current that I
cvsup'ed.
1. On UP,
sys_time is a global and contains the system wide stats
cpu_time is a global and is essentially the same as sys_time.
2. On S
8 matches
Mail list logo