On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:02:02PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> I use tinydns and dnscache to do the local DNS, so I don't have to touch
> the /etc/hosts anymore. The /etc/hosts is just pain in my ass. It solved
> all of my SSH and other reverse lookup problems. Current, I have the split
> h
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:13:06 +0200, Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:59:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
My solution is to install and setup dnscache to do the local DNS cache.
DNS cache sounds like it caches DNS records after a successfull
DNS query, right ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said this stuff:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:55:10AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
[...]
> > > >But what about:
> > > > VerifyReverseMapping
> > > > Specifies whether sshd should try to verify the remote host
> > > > name
> > > > and chec
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:59:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> My solution is to install and setup dnscache to do the local DNS cache.
DNS cache sounds like it caches DNS records after a successfull
DNS query, right ?
The problem at my clients project was, that the DNS server
a) wasn't reach
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:27:27 +0200, Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:55:10AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:54:35PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:46:46AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:55:10AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:54:35PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > >On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:46:46AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >>The fact that sshd requires reverse IP resolution is well-known
>
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:54:35PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:46:46AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>The fact that sshd requires reverse IP resolution is well-known
> >>behaviour. It's probably the most common FAQ about sshd ("Why is my
>
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:46:46AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Anyone else see this type of thing before? I did some research on the
lists but all I ever saw was a problem with reading resolv.conf. That's
not the case here, because it's definitely picking up the nameserver
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:46:46AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Anyone else see this type of thing before? I did some research on the
> > lists but all I ever saw was a problem with reading resolv.conf. That's
> > not the case here, because it's definitely picking up the nameserver
> > from t
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:43:53PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
> I figured that nsswitch.conf would deprecate host.conf. Is this not true?
On 5.x I think you're right. On 4.x it still is host.conf. (Or there
is no nsswicth.conf installed by default and no manual pages - I haven't
dug hard.)
Ted Faber wrote:
I'll bet that the problem is with the format of your /etc/hosts . Check
out the man page (man 5 hosts) and plink with it until it does what you
want. Sometimes the lookups through /etc/hosts are counterintuitive -
for example I've had problems related to the order of names and a
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
Do you use Privilege Separation? That can give interesting results with
DNS due to chroot into /var/empty... see the mailing lists archives.
Argh. This frustrates me. I did some searching on various mailing lists
before, and when they talked about switching into /var/emp
On 2003.09.05 12:29:10 -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
> Ted Faber wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:04:04PM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
> >
> >>That much I know. I was just wondering why the daemon is trying DNS
> >>lookup when the IP in question is listed in /etc/hosts. I thought
> >>listi
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:29:10PM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
> Ted Faber wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:04:04PM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
> >>That much I know. I was just wondering why the daemon is trying DNS
> >>lookup when the IP in question is listed in /etc/hosts.
> >
> >If y
Ted Faber wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:04:04PM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
That much I know. I was just wondering why the daemon is trying DNS
lookup when the IP in question is listed in /etc/hosts. I thought
listings in /etc/hosts would supercede the need for a DNS lookup. Of
course, I
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:04:04PM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
> That much I know. I was just wondering why the daemon is trying DNS
> lookup when the IP in question is listed in /etc/hosts. I thought
> listings in /etc/hosts would supercede the need for a DNS lookup. Of
> course, I could be
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:32:52AM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
Anyone else see this type of thing before? I did some research on the
lists but all I ever saw was a problem with reading resolv.conf. That's
not the case here, because it's definitely picking up the nameserv
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:32:52AM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
> Anyone else see this type of thing before? I did some research on the
> lists but all I ever saw was a problem with reading resolv.conf. That's
> not the case here, because it's definitely picking up the nameserver
> from that
Hi,
I recently took one of our machines off the main network and set up a
crossover cable between it and my personal box. I was looking to scp
some large files over and I didn't want to swamp the network. (I use scp
from force of habit, even though ftp would probably be quicker in this
case.)
19 matches
Mail list logo
