Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2009-01-21 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 8:52:38 am pluknet wrote: > 2008/12/17 pluknet : > > 2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov : > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without > >>> merging a possible under

Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2008-12-17 Thread pluknet
2008/12/17 Paul B. Mahol : > On 12/17/08, pluknet wrote: >> 2008/12/17 Paul B. Mahol : >>> On 12/17/08, pluknet wrote: 2008/12/17 pluknet : > 2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov : >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZ

Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2008-12-17 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 12/17/08, pluknet wrote: > 2008/12/17 Paul B. Mahol : >> On 12/17/08, pluknet wrote: >>> 2008/12/17 pluknet : 2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov : > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG

Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2008-12-17 Thread pluknet
2008/12/17 Paul B. Mahol : > On 12/17/08, pluknet wrote: >> 2008/12/17 pluknet : >>> 2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov : On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: > Hi. > > Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without > merging a possible un

Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2008-12-17 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 12/17/08, pluknet wrote: > 2008/12/17 pluknet : >> 2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov : >>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: Hi. Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without merging a possible underlining infrastructure and breakin

Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2008-12-17 Thread pluknet
2008/12/17 pluknet : > 2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov : >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without >>> merging a possible underlining infrastructure and breaking something else? >>> I want to use i

Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2008-12-17 Thread pluknet
2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov : > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without >> merging a possible underlining infrastructure and breaking something else? >> I want to use it in my custom freebsd6 becau

Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2008-12-16 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: > Hi. > > Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without > merging a possible underlining infrastructure and breaking something else? > I want to use it in my custom freebsd6 because I see "interspersed strings > wr

PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6

2008-12-16 Thread pluknet
Hi. Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without merging a possible underlining infrastructure and breaking something else? I want to use it in my custom freebsd6 because I see "interspersed strings written from different CPUs at the same time": uuusseseerrvmrem: vlmiv