Re: PR #10971, not dead yet.

2000-05-31 Thread Ian Dowse
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David E. Cross" writes: >though. Especially confusing is the following sequence of events: > > 41096 ypserv CALL select(0x10,0x8051040,0,0,0xbfbff518) > 41096 ypserv PSIG SIGCHLD caught handler=0x804c75c mask=0x0 code=0x0 ... > 41096 ypserv RET sigretur

Re: PR #10971, not dead yet.

2000-05-31 Thread David E. Cross
> > Alas, this is not something I have been able to reliably reproduce, it seems > > to trigger itself every so-often (and at inconvienient times). But no > > matter what I do by myself it will not trip. > > Is it possibly related to a low-memory situation? I'm trying to solve a > problem in cr

Re: PR #10971, not dead yet.

2000-05-31 Thread Guy Helmer
On Wed, 31 May 2000, David E. Cross wrote: > >If you can reproduce the problem regularly then I recommend putting > >a signal guard in to see if the corruption is being caused by the > >signal interrupting at an inausipcious moment. > > > >In main() block SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM,

Re: PR #10971, not dead yet.

2000-05-31 Thread David E. Cross
>If you can reproduce the problem regularly then I recommend putting >a signal guard in to see if the corruption is being caused by the >signal interrupting at an inausipcious moment. > >In main() block SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM, and SIGCHLD using sigsetmask(). > >Just prior to t

Re: PR #10971, not dead yet.

2000-05-31 Thread Matthew Dillon
:We have still have a problem with PR #10971 here running a -STABLE as of last :week. (Long since 10971 should have been dead). It is a difficult problem :to track down as stack corruption makes debugging files less than useless. :I do, however, have a ktrace of an entire transaction that causes

PR #10971, not dead yet.

2000-05-31 Thread David E. Cross
We have still have a problem with PR #10971 here running a -STABLE as of last week. (Long since 10971 should have been dead). It is a difficult problem to track down as stack corruption makes debugging files less than useless. I do, however, have a ktrace of an entire transaction that causes yps