On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:37:18PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
> I'm not that current on krb5, but I do have to ask if the CERT issues
> have been resolved? My info on this is a little old, but I recall
> CERT advisories last year on serious vulnerabilities in krb5 at the
> time, it would be nice to
David Terrell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:56:06PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
>>I like Kerberos 5 and it's ability to use tickets so I don't have to type
>>passwords whenever I login/su/need to authenticate myself. So it *really*
>>annoys me that there is a pam_krb5 module that allows
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:56:06PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> I like Kerberos 5 and it's ability to use tickets so I don't have to type
> passwords whenever I login/su/need to authenticate myself. So it *really*
> annoys me that there is a pam_krb5 module that allows you to authenticate
> again
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:56:06PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> I like Kerberos 5 and it's ability to use tickets so I don't have to type
> passwords whenever I login/su/need to authenticate myself. So it *really*
> annoys me that there is a pam_krb5 module that allows you to authenticate
> again
I like Kerberos 5 and it's ability to use tickets so I don't have to type
passwords whenever I login/su/need to authenticate myself. So it *really*
annoys me that there is a pam_krb5 module that allows you to authenticate
against a Kerberos 5 principal but it won't accept any tickets that I try
to
5 matches
Mail list logo