> I think the time is right to reward companies that "get it". I propose
> that the way to do this is to create an "open hardware" trademark that
> can be used for marketing by companies that sell hardware for which they
> either provide sufficient documentation that a fully featured device
> driv
Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> Yes, it's a pretty sad state of affairs. What annoys me the most is
> that companies actually believe they are protecting something when
> they don't make their device driver source or hardware documentation
> available. It has been well proven for years t
2 matches
Mail list logo
