On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:41:42PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> I recall that our "make -j X" actually limits the number
> of make processes/jobs to X. I don't know anything about
> build.sh, so I don't know if our make is at all being
> involved, but it would be good to know how the load varie
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:32:00 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>
> > Is the FreeBSD's FS management so slow?
> >
> > http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img15.html
> >
> > Or so big is the difference between the two cpu scheduler?
>
> Also, there's a known
On Apr 30, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Is the FreeBSD's FS management so slow?
http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img15.html
Or so big is the difference between the two cpu scheduler?
Also, there's a known and serious performance regression
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Is the FreeBSD's FS management so slow?
http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img15.html
Or so big is the difference between the two cpu scheduler?
Also, there's a known and serious performance regression in CAM relating to
tgged queueing, and the generic d
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Is the FreeBSD's FS management so slow?
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img15.html
>
> Or so big is the difference between the two cpu scheduler?
>
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img0.html
We would need more information about the disk har
Is the FreeBSD's FS management so slow?
http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img15.html
Or so big is the difference between the two cpu scheduler?
http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img0.html
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
6 matches
Mail list logo
