Re: nmbclusters and nmbufs

2003-08-19 Thread Maxim Konovalov
-questions material indeed. On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, 11:53+0400, Varshavchick Alexander wrote: > Hi, > > Can anybody advise please if I want to increase nmbclusters option in > kernel, can I just type > sysctl kern.ipc.nmbclusters="16384" > without rebooting the s

nmbclusters and nmbufs

2003-08-19 Thread Varshavchick Alexander
Hi, Can anybody advise please if I want to increase nmbclusters option in kernel, can I just type sysctl kern.ipc.nmbclusters="16384" without rebooting the server, or is the only way to set the NMBCLUSTERS option in kernel, install the new kernel and reboot? And secondly, also

Re: NMBCLUSTERS question

2002-01-28 Thread Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you > allocate too many nmbclusters? No. > For example, if you have a disk with a kernel compiled with 25000 > clusters and you pop it on a machine with only 64M, will it crash >

Re: NMBCLUSTERS question

2002-01-28 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020128 16:35] wrote: > > Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you > allocate too many nmbclusters? For example, if you have a disk with a kernel > compiled with 25000 clusters and you pop it on a

NMBCLUSTERS question

2002-01-28 Thread TD790
Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you allocate too many nmbclusters? For example, if you have a disk with a kernel compiled with 25000 clusters and you pop it on a machine with only 64M, will it crash and burn? Also are clusters allocated out of the

Re: FBSD-3.4, full bgp routing, maxusers, NMBCLUSTERS

2000-04-03 Thread vova
gt; i'm using zebra to do full BGP routing with 2 peers. > > netstat -rn shows some 75,000 routes. > > i've got: > maxusers32 > options NMBCLUSTERS=1 > > vmstat -m shows: > routetbl 154337 21118K 21118K 21118K 237725

Re: FBSD-3.4, full bgp routing, maxusers, NMBCLUSTERS

2000-04-03 Thread Jim Mercer
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 04:18:37PM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote: > From the original post I understood that the problem is that not all > physical RAM is detected. Is FreeBSD seeing all oof the 128 MB's, or only 80 > MB's? i think it is seeing all of it: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #4: Mon Apr 3 01:25:50 E

RE: FBSD-3.4, full bgp routing, maxusers, NMBCLUSTERS

2000-04-03 Thread Koster, K.J.
Dear Hackers, >From the original post I understood that the problem is that not all physical RAM is detected. Is FreeBSD seeing all oof the 128 MB's, or only 80 MB's? Kees Jan == You are only young once, but you can stay immature all your l

Re: FBSD-3.4, full bgp routing, maxusers, NMBCLUSTERS

2000-04-03 Thread Jim Mercer
address space, would moving from 3.4 to 4.0 resolve some of my problems? since i only have 128M in the machine, i guess i'll need to increase the amount of physical RAM as well? > >i thought NMBCLUSTERS was the one, but i guess not. > > That's just for network buffers. ah.

Re: FBSD-3.4, full bgp routing, maxusers, NMBCLUSTERS

2000-04-03 Thread Tony Finch
Jim Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >how do i increase the amount of RAM for the kernel? http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/hackers.html#AEN4204 >i thought NMBCLUSTERS was the one, but i guess not. That's just for network buffers. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FBSD-3.4, full bgp routing, maxusers, NMBCLUSTERS

2000-04-03 Thread Jim Mercer
e 75,000 routes. i've got: maxusers 32 options NMBCLUSTERS=1 vmstat -m shows: routetbl 154337 21118K 21118K 21118K 2377250 0 16,32,64,128,256 Memory Totals: In UseFreeRequests 21842K 47K 249883 how do i increase the amount of R

Re: NMBCLUSTERS

2000-02-06 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Egervary Gergely wrote: > what size of $SUBJECT should be used on a box with two _extremely_ busy > 100baseTX interfaces? This is what we run on our mail servers (with only one interface :) ) 867/8780/16384 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) I think we've blown up the

Re: NMBCLUSTERS

2000-02-02 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 02), Egervary Gergely said: > hmm right. well I've just compiled with 4096, my statistics after 9 > minutes uptime: > > 2308/3182/4096 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) I'd say you need to raise it a bit more then if you're at 75% capacity after only 9 minutes :)

Re: NMBCLUSTERS

2000-02-02 Thread Egervary Gergely
t; > That's just using whatever value of NMBCLUSTERS a 'maxusers 100' gives > me. hmm right. well I've just compiled with 4096, my statistics after 9 minutes uptime: 2308/3182/4096 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO

Re: NMBCLUSTERS

2000-02-02 Thread Dan Nelson
eavily used the whole day, and after 22 days of uptime, netstat -m shows: 72/596/2112 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) That's just using whatever value of NMBCLUSTERS a 'maxusers 100' gives me. On the other hand, when the Star Wars trailers were released last year, I was a m

NMBCLUSTERS

2000-02-02 Thread Egervary Gergely
hello, what size of $SUBJECT should be used on a box with two _extremely_ busy 100baseTX interfaces? -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

2.2.7 + NBUF + NMBCLUSTERS

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hoi folx, I have a 2.2.7 system that runs out of mbuf clusters. maxuser 64 I've raised options NMBCLUSTERS=6144 options NBUF=3072 and that made it for a while. However the system is running a chatserver and a webserver of a customer and now it hits me again. Are ther

2.2.7 + NBUF + NMBCLUSTERS

1999-06-22 Thread Markus Stumpf
Hoi folx, I have a 2.2.7 system that runs out of mbuf clusters. maxuser 64 I've raised options NMBCLUSTERS=6144 options NBUF=3072 and that made it for a while. However the system is running a chatserver and a webserver of a customer and now it hits me again. Are ther