+1.
On 28 September 2013 06:56, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 20:37 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > I have a system with 4GB RAM and hence need to use an amd64 kernel to use
> > all the RAM (I can only access 3GB RAM with an i386 kernel). OTOH, amd64
> > processes are significantly
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Peter Jeremy wrote:
I have a system with 4GB RAM and hence need to use an amd64 kernel to use
all the RAM (I can only access 3GB RAM with an i386 kernel). OTOH, amd64
processes are significantly (50-100%) larger than equivalent i386 processes
and none none of the applicat
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 01:25:39PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:37, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > I have a system with 4GB RAM and hence need to use an amd64 kernel to use
> > all the RAM (I can only access 3GB RAM with an i386 kernel). OTOH, amd64
> > processes are significant
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 20:37 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I have a system with 4GB RAM and hence need to use an amd64 kernel to use
> all the RAM (I can only access 3GB RAM with an i386 kernel). OTOH, amd64
> processes are significantly (50-100%) larger than equivalent i386 processes
> and none non
On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:37, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I have a system with 4GB RAM and hence need to use an amd64 kernel to use
> all the RAM (I can only access 3GB RAM with an i386 kernel). OTOH, amd64
> processes are significantly (50-100%) larger than equivalent i386 processes
> and none none of th
I have a system with 4GB RAM and hence need to use an amd64 kernel to use
all the RAM (I can only access 3GB RAM with an i386 kernel). OTOH, amd64
processes are significantly (50-100%) larger than equivalent i386 processes
and none none of the applications I'll be running on the system need to be
6 matches
Mail list logo