Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-10 Thread clemens fischer
[cc's deleted] Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Slashdot as a source of information, heh :) actually i never read slashdot, but it was mentioned that the freebsd-core members had issued a full public statement on this case, which i still cannot find anywhere. so i had to resort to whatever

Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel Mendez
On 10 Feb 2003 12:02:24 +0100 "clemens fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Howdy, > sorry to insist, but even after following all the links in the > slashdot-story this isn't clear to me. was it really about the > ipfw-hack he proposed? there were eight (or so) emails cited from a > developers

Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-10 Thread clemens fischer
Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/rules.html sorry to insist, but even after following all the links in the slashdot-story this isn't clear to me. was it really about the ipfw-hack he proposed? there were eight (or so) emails

Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-09 Thread Wes Peters
On Sunday 09 February 2003 19:20, clemens fischer wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [about removing matt d. committer bit] > > > If so, tell me now, please, what kind of reasons left, that can't be > > shown in public forum? > > i'd be satisfied with the reasons that _can be_ sh

Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-09 Thread clemens fischer
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [about removing matt d. committer bit] > If so, tell me now, please, what kind of reasons left, that can't be > shown in public forum? i'd be satisfied with the reasons that _can be_ shown in a public forum, because anything else can't be but personal and

Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-05 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:10:33PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: +> Please don't submit bogus PRs like this. It's actually funny, but the +> people who receive the messages from new PR submissions ar already +> flooded with many things. Let us not increase their load by creating +> many PRs tha

Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-05 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-02-04 10:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Description: > There is commit bit for Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > It was removed without any explanation. > [snip] Please don't submit bogus PRs like this. It's actually funny, but the people who receive

Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-04 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:48:40AM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: +> There is commit bit for Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Grr:) s/is/ISN'T/ -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek UNIX Systems Administrator http://garage.freebsd.pl Am I Evil? Yes, I Am. msg39615/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP si

Missing commit bit [PATCH].

2003-02-04 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Pawel Jakub Dawidek >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Missing commit bit [PATCH]. >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Category: misc >Class: change-request >Release: