Re: Machines with >= 4GB of RAM

2003-12-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And what is the configuration value to achieve this? This is in the FAQ. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-h

Re: Machines with >= 4GB of RAM

2003-12-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Andrew Kinney wrote: > On 17 Dec 2003 at 15:44, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > options KVA_PAGES=512 > > > > may be a start, but is it still required, and do I have to change > > anything else to match it? (where does the Makefile work out where to > > link the kernel for?) > > Is a value of 512

Re: Machines with >= 4GB of RAM

2003-12-18 Thread Andrew Kinney
On 17 Dec 2003 at 15:44, Julian Elischer wrote: > options KVA_PAGES=512 > > may be a start, but is it still required, and do I have to change > anything else to match it? (where does the Makefile work out where to > link the kernel for?) > Is a value of 512 enough for a machine with 16GB of

Re: Machines with >= 4GB of RAM

2003-12-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:44:49PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Obviously for >4GB you need PAE Or an AMD64 machine. (which don't cost anymore than a machine you'd be worrying aboiut PAE on) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Machines with >= 4GB of RAM

2003-12-17 Thread Julian Elischer
Obviously for >4GB you need PAE but at one stage it was required that to run with 54GB of ram the kernel base was moved down from the 3GB point (0xc000) to the 2GB point (0x8000) Is this still required? And what is the configuration value to achieve this? I've been trying to thing os sear