On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:12:42AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:34, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > You may want to check out timeout(9) / untimeout(9), see man 9 timeout
> > > for details.
> >
> > You should not use timeout(9) without a very good reason, the callout_*
> >
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:34, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > You may want to check out timeout(9) / untimeout(9), see man 9 timeout
> > for details.
>
> You should not use timeout(9) without a very good reason, the callout_*
> interface is prefered.
Can someone add a warning to the top of the makefile
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 06:03:11AM -0700, ALeine wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > DELAY() in FreeBSD uses a busy loop . I am looking for something
> > like sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU
> > cycles by DELAY'ing)
>
> You may want to check out timeout(9) /
> sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU cycles
You may want to try the manual pages.
% man -k sleep | fgrep '(9)'
endtsleep(9), sleepinit(9), unsleep(9) - manage the queues of sleeping processes
init_sleepqueues(9) ... sleepq_wai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DELAY() in FreeBSD uses a busy loop . I am looking for something
> like sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU
> cycles by DELAY'ing)
You may want to check out timeout(9) / untimeout(9), see man 9 timeout
for details.
> As I am pretty new to
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:46, Dipjyoti Saikia wrote:
> DELAY() in FreeBSD uses a busy loop . I am looking for something like
> sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU cycles
> by DELAY'ing)
tsleep/msleep/timeout are probably what you want.
--
Daniel O'Connor software and ne
queues etc) in
Free BSD .
---Dip
On 4/13/05, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:33:22AM +0530, Dipjyoti Saikia wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can any one help me out with a better Implementation of MDELAY() in
> > FreeBSD kerne
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:33:22AM +0530, Dipjyoti Saikia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can any one help me out with a better Implementation of MDELAY() in
> FreeBSD kernel 4.10
Please start by defining better.
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE
Hi,
Can any one help me out with a better Implementation of MDELAY() in
FreeBSD kernel 4.10
Thanks
Dip
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
9 matches
Mail list logo