On Tuesday 25 March 2003 08:14, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:18:43PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> >Well, it's just a home server. I don't mind a few crashes, but security is
> >important for me. What do you think, should I go back to -stable?
>
> If you're willing to put up with a fe
On Monday 24 March 2003 11:18, Daniela wrote:
> On Sunday 23 March 2003 20:20, Wes Peters wrote:
> >
> > The reason for creating the 5.0 release is to make it easy for more
> > developers and testers to jump onto the 5.x bandwagon by giving them
> > a known (relatively) good starting point. Quite
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:18:43PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
>Well, it's just a home server. I don't mind a few crashes, but security is
>important for me. What do you think, should I go back to -stable?
If you're willing to put up with a few crashes _and_ assist with
debugging the crashes (eg trying
On Sunday 23 March 2003 20:20, Wes Peters wrote:
> On Saturday 22 March 2003 15:10, Daniela wrote:
> > > I know, but 5.0-RELEASE was
> > >
> > > a) A work-in-progress, not a perfect, bug-free release
> > >
> > > b) A snapshot of 5.0-CURRENT
> > >
> > > You read the 5.0 Early Adopter's Guide, right?
On Saturday 22 March 2003 15:10, Daniela wrote:
> > I know, but 5.0-RELEASE was
> >
> > a) A work-in-progress, not a perfect, bug-free release
> >
> > b) A snapshot of 5.0-CURRENT
> >
> > You read the 5.0 Early Adopter's Guide, right? Bugs like this are
> > expected at this stage in the developmen
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:10:38 +0100
Daniela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know, but 5.0-RELEASE was
> >
> > a) A work-in-progress, not a perfect, bug-free release
> >
> > b) A snapshot of 5.0-CURRENT
> >
> > You read the 5.0 Early Adopter's Guide, right? Bugs like this are
> > expected at this
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 12:10:38AM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> Yes, I read the Early Adopter's Guide.
> Is there any way to solve this without upgrading to -current?
If you wanted to dig through the CVS commit logs to find the change
that fixed this problem (this may be difficult), you could back-por
> I know, but 5.0-RELEASE was
>
> a) A work-in-progress, not a perfect, bug-free release
>
> b) A snapshot of 5.0-CURRENT
>
> You read the 5.0 Early Adopter's Guide, right? Bugs like this are
> expected at this stage in the development process, and if you
> encounter them then you need to either g
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 10:26:01PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2003 22:10, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:37:46PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
> &
On Friday 21 March 2003 22:10, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:37:46PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
> > My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more detailed informations.
> >
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:37:46PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
> My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more detailed informations.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I think this was fixed after 5.0-R..upgrade
Daniela wrote:
> I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
> My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more detailed informations.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> I'm not yet intimate with the kernel, but I'm willing to learn it all.
> Thanks in
Hi all!
I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more detailed informations.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I'm not yet intimate with the kernel, but I'm willing to learn it all.
Thanks in ad
13 matches
Mail list logo
